MHB Number of elements and subgroups

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a group theory problem involving a group \( G \) of order 150 and a non-normal subgroup \( H \) of order 25. The analysis reveals that \( G \) cannot contain elements of order 5 or 25, leading to the conclusion that both counts are zero. The reasoning employs the orbit-stabilizer theorem and Sylow theorems to establish that the existence of such elements would contradict the non-normality of the Sylow 5-subgroups in \( G \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically Sylow theorems.
  • Familiarity with the orbit-stabilizer theorem in group actions.
  • Knowledge of group orders and subgroup properties.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving group actions and permutations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Sylow theorems in finite group theory.
  • Learn about the orbit-stabilizer theorem and its implications in group actions.
  • Explore examples of non-normal subgroups in finite groups.
  • Investigate the classification of groups of small orders, particularly groups of order 30 and 150.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students preparing for advanced group theory examinations, and anyone interested in the properties of finite groups and subgroup structures.

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I have a question that I feel I am going about in a roundabout way, and would like some help on. I am preparing for an exam.

**Problem:** Let $G$ be a group with $|G|=150.$ Let $H$ be a non-normal subgroup in $G$ with $|H|=25$.

(a) How many elements of order 5 does $G$ have?

(b) How many elements of order 25 does $G$ have?

**My attempt:**

$G$ has 6 subgroups of order 25 because the number of subgroups of order 25 has to divide $150/25=6$ and $6 \cong 1 (\mod 5)$. So there are 6 such subgroups: $\{H_1,H_2,H_3,H_4,H_5,H_6\}$. Let $G$ act on this set by conjugation. The permutation representation of the group action of conjugation on this set is $\phi:G \rightarrow S_6$, and $|S_6|=720$. Also, $|\ker(\phi)||im(\phi)|=150$. Because $|im(\phi)|$ has at most one factor of $5$, $5$ divides $|\ker(\phi)|$. Suppose $25$ divides $|\ker(\phi)|$. Then $\ker(\phi)$ has a Sylow 5-subgroup $H_i$. So $H_i \subset \ker(\phi) \implies aH_ia^{-1} \subset a(\ker(\phi))a^{-1} = \ker(\phi)$. By the Second Sylow Theorem, $H_1 \cup \ldots \cup H_6 \subset \ker(\phi) \implies G = \ker(\phi) \implies \phi$ trivial. So $\ker(\phi)$ has a subgroup $K$ with $|K|=5$. So for some $H_i, \ker(\phi) \cap H_i=K \implies a(\ker(\phi))a^{-1} \cap aH_ia^{-1} = aKa^{-1}$

What next? Surely this shouldn't be so long-winded.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an interesting problem.

I think you have established that $G$ contains a non-trivial normal subgroup. Now let's consider the orbit-stabilizer theorem in light of this:

We have, for $x \in \{H_1,H_2,H_3,H_4,H_5,H_6\}$:

$|G| = |Gx|\ast|\text{Stab}(x)|$

Since this action is transitive (any sylow 5-subgroup is some conjugate of $H_1$, for example) we have $|Gx| = 6$, which means that $|\text{Stab}(x)| = 25$.

Since $H_i \subseteq \text{Stab}(H_i)$, it is clear that these sylow 5-subgroups are indeed their own stabilizers under the action.

Thus the kernel of the action is the intersection of all the stabilizers, which means that:

$|\text{ker}(\phi)| = 5$.

This tells us that $|\phi(G)| = 150/5 = 30$.

Now any group of order 30 has a normal sylow 5-subgroup, which means that the pre-image of that subgroup (under $\phi$) is a normal subgroup containing $\text{ker}(\phi)$. But such a pre-image is a group of order 25 in $G$, which contradicts the non-normality of any 5-sylow subgroup in $G$.

Hence $G$ does not exist, and the answer to (a) and (b) is: 0.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K