Number of integration constants

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the number of integration constants required when solving a system of ordinary differential equations in mechanics, particularly in the context of initial conditions and their implications on the solutions. Participants explore the relationships between velocity, acceleration, and position in oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that for the equation of motion derived from acceleration, there are two integration constants, but only one initial condition for velocity is provided, leading to a question about setting one constant to zero.
  • Another participant provides a solution for the coordinate based on the velocity function, suggesting specific values for the constants based on initial conditions.
  • A participant raises a concern about having only two initial conditions and the resulting three integration constants when integrating the velocity function, questioning the reasoning behind setting one constant to zero.
  • One participant requests criticism of their formula for position, indicating a potential discrepancy with another participant's approach.
  • A participant corrects a previous post regarding the integration of the velocity function and arrives at a consistent result with another participant's findings.
  • Another participant expresses doubt about the generality of the proposed solution, noting that the initial coordinate condition does not determine certain constants.
  • A participant agrees with the observation that the initial coordinate condition does not uniquely determine the constants, emphasizing the role of initial velocity and acceleration in defining the motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the number of integration constants required and the implications of initial conditions. There is no consensus on whether setting constants to zero is justified, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their reasoning, including assumptions about the relationship between initial conditions and integration constants, as well as the dependence on the specific forms of the differential equations being discussed.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
If we have system of 3 ordinary differential equation in mechanics and we have two initial condition ##\vec{r}(t=0)=0## and ##\vec{v}(t=0)=\vec{v}_0 \vec{i}##. If we somehow get
\frac{d^2v_x}{dt^2}=-\omega^2v_x
then v_x(t)=A\sin(\omega t)+B\cos(\omega t)
Two integration constants and one initial condition for velocity. What to do? Should we put that one constant is equal to zero? So ##A=0##, ##B=v_0##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your solution of velocity,
cooridinate:
x=A\frac{1-\cos \omega t}{\omega}+B \frac{\sin \omega t}{\omega}
accerelation:
a=A\omega \cos \omega t - B\omega \sin \omega t
So
A= \frac{a_0}{\omega}
B= v_0
 
Yes, I agree. But suppose that I have only two initial conditions in the beginning. I do not know acceleration. When I integrate ##v_x(t)## I will get
x(t)=C\cos(\omega t)+D\sin (\omega t)+E
so 3 integration constants. And because ##x(t)## satisfy some differential equation of second order, general solution should have only 2 integration constants. And I can put ##D=0##. Is it good reasoning?
 
Last edited:
My formula of x in #2 which includes initial coordinate condition is different from yours. Please criticize it.
 
I made a typo. From ##v_x(t)=A\sin \omega t+B \cos \omega t## you can write
##\frac{dx}{dt}=A\sin \omega t+B \cos \omega t##
by integrating
##x(t)=-\frac{A}{\omega}\cos \omega t+\frac{B}{\omega}\sin \omega t+E##.
Of course I can say that ##\frac{A}{\omega}=C## and ##\frac{B}{\omega}=D##
Initial condition is ##x(0)=0##. From that
##0=-\frac{A}{\omega}+E##.
I will get the same result as you.
 
Last edited:
LagrangeEuler said:
anuttarasammyak said:
From your solution of velocity,
cooridinate:
x=A\frac{1-\cos \omega t}{\omega}+B \frac{\sin \omega t}{\omega}
accerelation:
a=A\omega \cos \omega t - B\omega \sin \omega t
So
A= \frac{a_0}{\omega}
B= v_0
I do not think also that this is a general solution. Because by putting ##t=0## first term is always zero, regardless of value of ##A##.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
by integrating
sin and cos are to be exchanged.

I agree with your observation that initial coordinate condition does not decide A nor B. As said in #2 initial velocity and initial acceleration decide them.

Popular oscillation equation for x has two constnts to decide the motion, initial cooridinate and initial velocity. Your oscillation equation for v, which has three times derivative of coordinates thus is not Newton's equation of motion, has two constants to decide the motion, initial velocity and initial acceleration. All one rank up in time derivative.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K