Number of monomials of degree at most d

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathstime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
mathstime
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
How does one show that the number of monomials in a finite field of degree at most d is

n+d choose n?? (sorry, I don't know how to write this in maths language)

In theory I know how to do this, but I am making a mistake somewhere along the line and get a different answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How many choices do you have for each coefficient?
How many coefficients can you choose?

It may help to try some simple cases... if you have the field of two elements, how many quadratic polynomials are there? Cubic polynomials? You should notice a pattern pretty quickly
 
the paper I am reading says:

Finite field F[x_1, ..., x_n] of degree at most d
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top