MHB Number of students in a class at first

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class students
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the number of pupils in a class initially, given that four more joined after a week. The correct expression for the total number of pupils after a week is m + 4. When provided with the total of 40 pupils after a week, the equation m + 4 = 40 can be solved to find that there were 36 pupils initially. The answers from a book suggesting m - 20 and 30 are deemed incorrect by participants in the discussion. The consensus is that the initial number of pupils should be calculated as 36.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
There were m pupils in a class at first. After a week, 4 more pupils joined the class.

a) Find the number of pupils in the class after a week in terms of m.

my answer: m + 4b) There were 40 pupils in the class after a week. How many pupils were there in the class at first?

my answer: no answer

I'm not sure about this question.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Johnx said:
There were m pupils in a class at first. After a week, 4 more pupils joined the class.

a) Find the number of pupils in the class after a week in terms of m.

my answer: m + 4

Yes, that's good.

Johnx said:
b) There were 40 pupils in the class after a week. How many pupils were there in the class at first?

my answer: no answer

I'm not sure about this question.

Here, they are telling you:

$$m+4=40$$

So, you need to solve for \(m\) to determine how many pupils were there in the class at first (because this is what \(m\) represents).

What do you find?
 
Thanks for the reply

There was a different answer that didn't make any sense to me.

The answer that I was given from the book was.

a) m - 20

b) 30.Is this incorrect?
 
Yes, I don't see how the answers given by your book could possibly be correct.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
9K
Back
Top