MHB How Do You Solve a Triangle Problem on a Number Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArchieK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To solve a triangle problem on a number plane, the coordinates of points A and B are determined from the line equation 2x + y = 8 by converting it to two-intercept form, yielding A=(4,0) and B=(0,8). The distance between points A and B is calculated using the distance formula, resulting in 4√5. Part ii reveals that triangle OBC is a right isosceles triangle, with angle ABC approximated at 18 degrees. For part iii, the line through point C, perpendicular to AB, intersects the line 2x + y = 8 at point N=(3,2). This discussion effectively illustrates the methods for solving triangle problems on a number plane.
ArchieK
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please just hint me in the right direction, I'm kind of lost with it. Thanks for any help

View attachment 4519
 

Attachments

  • 11694353_849767625072575_1544274083_n.jpg
    11694353_849767625072575_1544274083_n.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 95
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For part i), we need to know the coordinates of both points $A$ and $B$. This means we need to find the two intercepts of the line:

$$2x+y=8\tag{1}$$

One way to do this is the express the line in the two-intercept form:

$$\frac{x}{a}+\frac{y}{b}=1\tag{2}$$

and then we know the points:

$$A=(a,0)\,\text{and}\,B=(0,b)$$

are on the line. So, can you express (1) in the form of (2)?
 
I see this thread has been marked as [SOLVED], and so I will post methods for answering the questions for the benefit of other users who might find this thread.

If we divide (1) by 8, we obtain:

$$\frac{x}{4}+\frac{y}{8}=1$$

And so we now know:

$$A=(4,0)\,\text{and}\,B=(0,8)$$

Now we can answer part i) using the distance formula:

$$\overline{AB}=\sqrt{(0-4)^2+(8-0)^2}=4\sqrt{1^2+2^2}=4\sqrt{5}$$

For part ii), let observe that $$\triangle OBC$$ is a right triangle, since we can show $$\overline{BC}\perp\overline{OC}$$ using the definition of slope and the fact that two lines are perpendicular if the product of their slopes is -1:

$$\frac{8-4}{0-7}\cdot\frac{7-0}{4-0}=-\frac{4}{7}\cdot\frac{7}{4}=-1$$

We also see that:

$$\overline{OC}=\overline{BC}$$, which means $$\triangle OBC$$ is a right isosceles triangle.

Now, we may compute:

$$\angle ABC=\angle OBC-\angle OBA=45^{\circ}-\arctan\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\approx18^{\circ}$$

For part iii), we need to first find the line passing through $C$, which is perpendicular to $$\overline{AB}$$...using the point-slope formula, we obtain:

$$y=\frac{1}{2}(x-7)+4=\frac{x+1}{2}$$

Now we need to find where this line intersects with:

$$2x+y=8\implies y=8-2x$$

Hence, equating both expressions for $y$, we get:

$$\frac{x+1}{2}=8-2x$$

$$x+1=16-4x$$

$$5x=15$$

$$x=3\implies y=2$$

Thus:

$$N=(3,2)$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top