1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Numerical aperture and lenses

  1. Dec 30, 2011 #1
    Hi

    I have two general questions regarding a lens and its numerical aperture:

    1) From this picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Numerical_aperture_for_a_lens.svg (from the Wiki-article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_aperture) it seems to me that there is a propotionality between the NA of a lens and its focal length, i.e. long focal length = small NA. However this doesn't always seem to be true when I look at optical elements in various catalogs?

    2) I read in an old thread (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=304834) that only when the full aperture of a lens is used will the total NA be available. Is it possible to give a rough estimate of how much of the NA is in use?

    Best wishes,
    Niles.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 30, 2011 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    The NA is the *ratio* of aperture diameter to focal length. Keeping the lens diameter constant, then yes-varying the focal length will also vary the numerical aperture (as is the case for some zoom lenses). As a specific example, one of my microscope lenses has a NA = 1.47 and the size of the front element is 1mm or so; my 400mm camera lens has a NA of 0.18 and the front element is about 140 mm in diameter.

    By closing down the aperture stop, you decrease the NA- again, camera lenses allow you to close down the aperture stop (those funny f-numbers 2.8, 4, 5.6, etc) which decreases the NA and increases the depth of field.
     
  4. Dec 31, 2011 #3
    Thanks. Just to clear, what you refer to is the f/# number, right?

    On Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_aperture#Numerical_aperture_versus_f-number) it says that we have f/# = 1/2NA when the lens is focused at infinity. Does this also refer to the case when I come in with a collimated beam, and focus it to a point not an infinity (I'm thinking reversal symmetry here)?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2011
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Numerical aperture and lenses
Loading...