Numerical Linear Algebra or Modern Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the choice between taking Intro to Modern Algebra and Numerical Linear Algebra for a physics undergraduate degree. Participants conclude that Numerical Linear Algebra is more beneficial, particularly for students planning to pursue graduate studies in physics or applied physics. The practical applications of Numerical Linear Algebra in programming and data analysis are emphasized, while the theoretical aspects of Modern Algebra, such as Sylow theorems and group theory, are deemed less applicable in the field of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of linear algebra concepts
  • Familiarity with programming for data analysis
  • Knowledge of abstract algebra fundamentals
  • Awareness of applications in physics and applied physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Numerical Linear Algebra techniques and algorithms
  • Learn programming languages commonly used in data analysis, such as Python or MATLAB
  • Investigate the applications of group theory in high energy physics
  • Review the curriculum of graduate programs in physics to identify key mathematical prerequisites
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, aspiring graduate students in physics or applied physics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of linear algebra in research and data analysis.

Ian Baughman
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
So I am working out a course schedule for my last two years of undergrad and have room for only one more math class but do not know which would be more beneficial. The two courses are Intro to Modern Algebra or Numerical Linear Algebra. I am working towards a bachelors degree in physics and plan to continue onto graduate school for physics or applied physics. Which one of these do you think would be more beneficial to take?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I took abstract algebra as it was then called as an undergrad physics/math major. Numerical linear algebra was not offered and computers were mainly mainframe and new at the time. Nevertheless, numerical linear algebra should be a lot more beneficial. I never used the abstract algebra for anything in physics.

Sure, I understood SU2 and SU3 underlying high energy physics had roots in group theory, and basic ideas of Lie algebra in QM used group theory and I got some benefit from that exposure. But Abstract algebra contains stuff like Sylow theorems, division rings, principle ideal domains, ideals, categories, etc, that never made their appearance in any depth at all which was covered in the math departments.

Numerical Linear algebra will allow you to program effectively should you use the computer to analyze data in your research (almost a sure thing)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K