Numerical Solution to Schrodinger Equation w/ Coulomb Potential

Tertius
Messages
57
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
I am trying to numerically solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the tunneling problem encountered in fusion processes (with a Coulomb barrier), specifically avoiding the use of the WKB approximation.
Relevant Equations
Schrodinger Equation
Coulomb Potential
I am doing this to have my own solution for customization and understanding. I also want to manually check the WKB approximation accuracy at various energies against this static solution.

I've split the problem into 3 regions and am solving it in 1D, but am having problems with how to define the initial boundary of Region 1.
$$r_{ctp}$$ is the classical turning point where incoming kinetic energy E equals coulomb potential V.
$$r_{nuc}$$ is the point where the nuclear strong force takes over at approximately the nuclear radius.

Region 1:
$$-\infty < x <= r_{ctp}$$
Region 1 has some of V(x) before reaching ##r_{ctp}##.
Equation:
$$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \psi_I(x) +V(x)\psi_I(x)=E\psi_I(x)$$
BCs:
$$\psi_I(-100) = 0$$
$$\psi_I'(-100) = 0.0001$$ (this is nonsense, and it propagates through the solutions).
If it is set to 0, then the solution is trivially 0. But the wave function should approach 0 going to ##-\infty##.

Region 2:
$$r_{ctp} < x <= r_{nuc}$$
Region 2 has negative kinetic energy because E < V.
Equation:
$$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \psi_{II}(x) +V(x)\psi_{II}(x)=E\psi_{II}(x)$$
BCs:
$$\psi_I(r_{ctp}) = \psi_{II}(r_{ctp})$$
$$\psi_I'(r_{ctp}) = \psi_{II}'(r_{ctp})$$

Region 3:
$$r_{nuc} < x <= 0$$
Region 3 is 'freely propagating' where ##V(x)=0##
Equation:
$$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \psi_{III}(x) =E\psi_{III}(x)$$
BCs:
$$\psi_{II}(r_{nuc}) = \psi_{III}(r_{nuc})$$

$$\psi_{II}'(r_{nuc}) = \psi_{III}'(r_{nuc})$$

This setup is producing the attached graph using NDSolve in Mathematica.

The two questions i have are:
1) what are the appropriate BCs for Region 1?
2) why is the Region 2 solution oscillatory when it should be exponential? Usually that's a minus sign problem but wondering if there is something else going on.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • tunneling v1.jpeg
    tunneling v1.jpeg
    21.9 KB · Views: 46
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured out where my approach was wrong. The boundary conditions for this are a little tricky because it is not a bound system.
So I discretized it manually and just solved $$H\psi = E\psi$$, where E is the kinetic energy of the incoming particle. E in this case is just a single eigenvalue because it is not a bound system, so it is possible to solve it as a simplified linear system as $$(H-EI)\psi = 0$$. This made it fast and give the same answer. But I did need to give the LinearSolver a small non-zero initial wave function value so it didn't give the trivial answer. Hope this helps someone.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top