Nyquist frequency for a system with rectangular pixels

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the Nyquist frequency for a digital imaging system with rectangular pixels, the formula f = 1/2 * pixel size applies, but the choice of dimension is crucial. The smaller dimension yields a higher Nyquist frequency, which is often desirable. However, the larger dimension may represent a limiting factor in the system's overall resolution. Each spatial frequency component (x and y) can have its own Nyquist frequency, allowing for different resolutions along different axes. Understanding these nuances is essential for optimizing imaging performance in PET and SPECT systems.
mitch_1211
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
hey everyone,

so i know to calculate the nyquist frequency for a system (for digital imaging in PET and SPECT in this example) given the pixel size its just f = 1/ 2 * pixel size

but for pixels that are rectangular and have a larger and smaller dimension, which one should be used here?

the smaller dimension obviously gives the higher nyquist frequency, is that what we are after here?

or do we use the larger dimension as that is a limiting factor of resolution of the system?

thanks :)

mitch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There will be two Nyquist frequencies, one each for each spatial frequency component (x and y).

It is permissible for a system to have different resolutions along different axes. An extreme example would be a 1D array of detectors.

Claude.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top