Nyquist Plot Intersection with Real Axes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Nyquist stability criterion, specifically on determining the intersection points of a Nyquist plot with the real axes. Participants emphasize the necessity of substituting 'jω' into the transfer function and solving for ω where the real part equals zero, expressed mathematically as RealPart(F(jω))=0. A suggestion is made to use numerical methods, such as Newton's method, for solving complex equations involving arctan functions. The conversation highlights the challenges of manually computing these intersections without software assistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nyquist stability criterion
  • Familiarity with transfer functions and their analysis
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Experience with numerical methods, particularly Newton's method
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive the Nyquist plot from a given transfer function
  • Study the application of Newton's method for solving nonlinear equations
  • Explore the use of arctan in phase calculations for control systems
  • Investigate software tools for Nyquist plot analysis, such as MATLAB or Python's control library
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students preparing for exams in control systems, and anyone involved in stability analysis of dynamic systems will benefit from this discussion.

nebbione
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I'm real confused and stucked about a point in applying Nyquist stability criterion... now i'll explain why.

I know that it's needed to know how many times I'm wrapping the nyquist critical point (-1;0) with my plot, and I'm enough good to draw by hand a nyquist plot, but the problem is to determine analitically the intersection value of the plot in which I'm interssecting the real axes, I've heard that i have to substitute 'jω' in my transfer function and after i have to divide the real part from the imaginary part of my transfer function and then find out the ω where I'm intersecting the real axes putting the real part of the transfer function equal to zero. Mathematically speaking : RealPart(F(jω))=0 where F is my transfer function.
Once I've found the ω i substitute that ω in my transfer function to find the exact point where I'm intersecting the real axes.
My first question is : Is there a quicker way to compute this point without using software, since I need it for a test ?

I've heard about the arctan way of computing the phase, but the problem is that if I put an equation (for example) like this :
arctan(w/3)+arctan(w/5)-3arctan(w/10)=-180

it's impossible for me to solve it...i don't know how to handle these arctan equations, my second question is : Is there a way to compute it ? And if not, which is the way to solve this problem ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nebbione said:
My first question is : Is there a quicker way to compute this point without using software, since I need it for a test ?
You could use Im(F(jω)) (edit: You meant Im(F(jω)) = 0 ?) and just punch in likely values for ω (on a calculator) until you find the sign change. That should put you close enough to the intersection with the real axis for a quick sketch.

nebbione said:
... my second question is : Is there a way to compute it ?
By hand? It's easy for some systems, hard for others. I had a very basic implementation of Newton's method on my calculator to solve equations like that numerically. Came in handy now and then.
 
Last edited:
Can you make me an example ?
For example if i have a transfer function like : F(s)= 10*(s+5)/(s-1)^3 how should i proceed ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K