Object on a Rope: Momentum & Kinetic Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter fizics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a point object connected to a stationary cylinder by a massless rope, participants explore the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy. The object moves in a way that the rope winds around the cylinder, raising questions about whether kinetic energy is conserved despite the work done by the tension in the rope. It is concluded that kinetic energy is conserved because no net work is done on the object, while angular momentum is not conserved due to external forces acting on the system. The confusion arises from the reference frame used to analyze the motion, with some suggesting that treating the cylinder as part of the system could lead to different conclusions about angular momentum. Ultimately, the presence of external forces prevents the conservation of angular momentum in this scenario.
fizics
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point object of mass m is connected to a cylinder of radius R via a massless rope. At time t = 0 the object is moving with an initial velocity v perpendicular to the rope, the rope has a length L, and the rope has a non-zero tension. All motion occurs on a horizontal frictionless surface. The cylinder remains stationary on the surface and does not rotate. The object moves in such a way that the rope slowly winds up around the cylinder. The rope will break when the tension exceeds Tmax.
I wonder if the momentum and kinetic energy of the object are conserved in this case.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? Is there more to the problem than your question? (What are they asking you to find?)
 
The problem actually has two questions,but both of them involve whether the kinetic energy or momentum is conserved.So after knowing whether they are conserved,I would solve the problem.The answer suggests that kinetic energy is conserved,while the angular momentum is not.But I can't get why.
 
Is work being done?

Is a torque being exerted?
 
I think there is work and no torque.
 
Last edited:
fizics said:
I think there's work done on it
What's doing the work?
 
The tension exerted by the cord is pulling the object closer to the cylinder,so it's doing work;but on the other hand,since both the mechanical energy and potential energy doesn't change,the kinetic energy should be conserved.I am confused.
 
Last edited:
fizics said:
The tension exerted by the cord is pulling the object closer to the cylinder,so it's doing work;
The cord is definitely exerting a force on the object, but to see if work is being done you must compare the direction of the force to the direction of the instantaneous velocity of the object.

Consider the other end of the rope. Is any work being done there?
 
The force is always perpendicular to the direction of velocity.Can I divide the process to many many uniform circular motions,where the radius is decreasing?Thus the kinetic energy is conserved.
And what about the angular momentum?I think there's no torque acting on it,so it's conserved as well.
 
  • #10
Yes, kinetic energy is conserved since no work is done.
fizics said:
And what about the angular momentum?I think there's no torque acting on it,so it's conserved as well.
Consider the angle that the rope makes with respect to the radial direction.

(If both kinetic energy and angular momentum are conserved, you'll have some explaining to do since the radius decreases.)
 
  • #11
Thank you.I know why I was confused.I was always thinking in a reference system where the tangential point made by the rope and cylinder is stationary,but actually it should be in one where the cylinder is stationary.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I looked at the question concerning the momentum again,it says:
"What is the angular momentum of the object with respect to the axis of the cylinder at the instant that the rope breaks?"
I paid too little attention too these words.
 
  • #13
Can't we treat the cylinder as part of the system? If so, then wouldn't the torque be internal and thus conserve angular momentum?
 
  • #14
compwiz3000 said:
Can't we treat the cylinder as part of the system? If so, then wouldn't the torque be internal and thus conserve angular momentum?
Since the cylinder is kept stationary, there are external forces acting. But if you included the cylinder+attached Earth as part of the system, then you'd be correct that total angular momentum would be conserved.
 
Back
Top