Does Object Positioning on a Scale Affect Its Measured Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stgma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale
AI Thread Summary
The positioning of an object on a scale generally should not affect its measured weight, especially with accurate scales. However, cheaper bathroom scales may yield different readings if the object overhangs or if the scale is placed on an uneven surface. The center of gravity (COG) is crucial, and ideally, it remains centered on the scale for accurate measurements. Anecdotal experiences suggest that some users perceive weight fluctuations when overhanging the scale. Overall, proper scale use and placement are essential for reliable weight readings.
stgma
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Code:
      a                         b  



     ___
    |   |
    |   |
    |   |
    |   |
    |   |
    |   |
    |   |             _____________________
    |   |            |                     |
    |___|            |_____________________|
=============             =============   
  ^       ^                 ^       ^

Hello

We've got an object on a scale and we are measuring it's weight. Does the positioning of this object on the scale influence the measured weight?
Notice how the sides of the object overflow the scale in diagram . Will the scale show a different (smaller) weight?

The scale and the object is the same in both diagrams. And the scale is perfect in terms of accuracy and function.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • scales.png
    scales.png
    400 bytes · Views: 439
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In theory it shouldn't matter and doesn't with good scales.
With cheap bathroom type scales it might make a difference because they bend easily, they also read wrongly if placed on carpet or an uneven surface for the same reason.
 
The COG is in the center of the scale, so you should never see any difference. However, this time of year, when I overhang the scale, I notice my weight seems to be up not down.
 
TVP45 said:
However, this time of year, when I overhang the scale, I notice my weight seems to be up not down.
A trick I learned from the Simpsons is to rest your stomach on the washbasin
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
598
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
484
Back
Top