Oblique Collisions and Momentum Conservation in Identical Mass Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
In oblique collisions involving identical mass objects, momentum conservation principles dictate that the two objects move at right angles to each other. The equations presented indicate that momentum is conserved only when the collision occurs at these right angles, as they are vector quantities. The discussion highlights a confusion regarding the terms in the equations, particularly the absence of p2.p2 in the final line, suggesting a need for clarification in the derivation. The correct substitution shows that p.p should equal p1.p1 plus p2.p2, reinforcing the vector nature of momentum. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately analyzing oblique collisions in physics.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
In an oblique collision (when one object hits another object of IDENTICAL mass at a slight angle the two objects move at right angles to each other.

my book says

p2 = p12 + p22

For momenum conservtation:

p= p1+ p2

apparently these equations can only be consistent of the collision occurs at right angles. why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
These are vectors, right?
p.p = (p1+p2).(p1+p2) [2nd equn]
= p1.p1 + 2.p1.p2 + p2.p2
= p.p + 2.p1.p2 [1st equn]
Hence p1.p2 = 0
 
haruspex said:
These are vectors, right?
p.p = (p1+p2).(p1+p2) [2nd equn]
= p1.p1 + 2.p1.p2 + p2.p2
= p.p + 2.p1.p2 [1st equn]
Hence p1.p2 = 0

where has p2.p2 gone in the final line
surely the final line should be
= p1.p2 + p2.p2, no?
 
Last edited:
1st equn says p.p = p1.p1 + p2.p2
To get from my second line to my third line, use this to substitute p.p for p1.p1 + p2.p2.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top