I Observing Emission Spectra from Computer Screens

AI Thread Summary
Observations of light from computer screens using a DIY spectroscope reveal that screens emit light with specific emission spectra. LED screens produce emission bands, while TFT screens utilize fluorescent tubes that excite phosphors, resulting in band spectra rather than distinct lines. The discussion highlights that modern displays, including OLEDs, have evolved from CRTs and LCDs, leading to improved visual quality. Measurements from a MacBook Pro and an iPhone show that a significant portion of the spectrum appears dark, with phosphors covering about 60% of the visible spectrum. This understanding of emission spectra can enhance the study of light sources and display technologies.
Luxdot
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
Hi!

I am doing some simple observations of different light sources with a simple DIY spectroscope. When I look at a computer screen I see what I believe to be an emission spectrum due to the dark spectrum with emission lines on it. Is this correct? And why does a computer screen emit an emission spectrum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer, nor TBH what the question is! But as you've been asking for a week, I'll offer a few comments.

First, if something emits light, it has an emission spectrum - that's just tautology isn't it?

If you are looking at an LED screen, the emissions are from LEDs (obviously) which produce bands rather than lines.

If you are looking at a TFT screen, then, in those I've seen, the light comes from a flourescent tube. You might imagine you're onto a better bet here, because fluorescent gases do emit line spectra. But the visible light comes not directly from the gas, but from the phosphors excited by the light from the gas. These again are solids, as in LEDs, so emit band spectra.

My bet would be that you are looking at an LED screen, because the LED emission bands can be quite narrow and might possibly be seen as fuzzy lines.

Hope that's of some help and that someone more knowledgeable in the area might turn up and correct me or add to the answer.
 
Merlin3189 said:
because the LED emission bands can be quite narrow and might possibly be seen as fuzzy lines.
TV displays have conflicting requirements. They need to be as bright as possible - which is easiest to achieve with broad band 'phosphors' and to have a well defined spectrum which means a narrow spectrum (none are actual spectral colours, of course.)
Things have changed a lot from CRT phosphors, through crude LCD colour, then to LED backlit and to OLED. You can understand how modern displays look so nice.
I have a cheap and cheerful spectroscope (about £30, iirc, on eBay) and it's very convenient for this sort of question. I haven't yet managed to get a good photo of the display but I can say that (on my MacBook Pro screen) the blue end has a band about 15% of the gamut, the green band is about 20% and the red has two distinct fuzzy bands about 20%. Between those, there are two dark bands of about 20%. So the phosphors cover about 60% of the spectrum. On the OLED screen of my iPhone, the three phosphors seem to a bit narrower bands with more than 50% dark.
So about half the spectrum is dark and half is' phosphor 'spectrum (pretty continuous, aamof.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top