Observing PF Global Guidelines on Written English Communication

  • Thread starter Thread starter shoehorn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The PF global guidelines emphasize the importance of adhering to written English communication standards, including proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling, while prohibiting SMS shorthand. There is a concern regarding the enforcement of these guidelines, especially among non-native English speakers, and the prevalence of "text speak" in posts. Some users express frustration with the lack of moderation on posts that violate these standards, particularly those that undermine clarity. The community is encouraged to report such posts to facilitate better adherence to the guidelines. Overall, maintaining clear communication is a priority for the forum.
shoehorn
Messages
420
Reaction score
2
The PF global guidelines state the following.

In the interest of conveying ideas as clearly as possible, posts are required to show reasonable attention to written English communication standards. This includes the use of proper grammatical structure, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling. SMS messaging shorthand, such as using "u" for "you", is not acceptable.


Given that many of those who post here do so without having English as a first language, it seems reasonable that the rules on acceptable grammar and so forth should be only loosely observed. However, it winds me up no end to see people using "text speak" here. How closely observed are the guidelines against such an abomination by the moderators?

I should point out that I'm generally not critical of sparse usage of neologisms such as "lol" or smilies, largely because they help in conveying nuance in otherwise ambiguous situations. However, heresies such as https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=412658, for instance, really deserve closer attention.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shoehorn said:
heresies such as https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=412658, for instance, really deserve closer attention.

Have you reported the post? If not, do so - and I am more than sure someone will be more than happy to react :devil:
 
It would be a great help to us if you would use the report button when you see these posts. Thanks. :)
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Replies
0
Views
22K
Replies
0
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
25K
Replies
0
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
28K
Replies
2
Views
69K
Back
Top