Odds of Winning a Lottery: Does Ticket Quantity Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatrabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    lottery Matter
hatrabbit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm wondering if a common assumption is correct: if the odds of winning a lotto game are, say, 1,000,000:1, will they remain proportional to the number of tickets purchased? For example in the above game if a person buys 2 tickets, will their odds be 500,000:1, 4 tickets probability being 250,000:1, etc. (as long as the tickets all have different numbers).

Thanks for any information
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes and that should be make sense considering if they bought 1,000,000 tickets, your probability of winning now have to be 1 (or 100%).

EDIT: This is dependent on what the "odds" are calculated from. If there is only 1 winning combination out of 1,000,000, then your idea is correct. However, as another member here pointed out, if you have 10 winning combinations out of 10,000,000, the "odds" can be said to be 1 in 1,000,000, but the probability is not as simple as the 1 win/1,000,000 combinations example.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top