Often a terminology is used in Electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
In electrodynamics, the phrase "in the absence of static and moving charges" refers to a scenario where magnetic effects are analyzed without the influence of excess electric charges or currents. This context is crucial for understanding magnetostatic material effects, as excess charges would introduce electrostatic phenomena and excess currents would create additional magnetic fields. The discussion highlights that while permanent magnets contain moving electrons, their overall charge and current are effectively neutralized at the macroscopic level. Consequently, the relationship B = μ(H) applies, where B is the magnetic field, μ is the permeability, and H is the magnetic field strength, under these idealized conditions. This approach simplifies the study of magnetic materials by isolating their inherent magnetic properties from other electromagnetic influences.
saravanan13
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Often a terminology is used in Electrodynamics "in the absence of static and moving charges" of a magnetic medium. what does this corresponds to and how do Maxwell turns out to be in this situation?
Please explain the context in detail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


They might be referring to the relative permeability of the material.
B=\mu(H)<br />
Not completely sure tho.
 
In reality, you can't have magnetic effects without electric charges. What they mean is there are no excess charges or currents . Excess charges would lead to electrostatic effects and excess currents would lead to extra magnetic fields. It sounds like the textbook is trying to isolate magnetostatic material effects for comprehension purposes from electrostatic effects and current-magnetic effects. A permanent magnet with nothing additional done to it could be thought of as a magnetic material with no excess charges or currents. Sure, there are electrons zipping about inside the magnet. But on the macroscopic level, the electrons' charge is canceled by the charge of the nuclei, so there is no net charge. And for similar reasons, there is no net excess current flowing through a permanent magnet left to itself.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top