Ohmic Resistor modelling ?(Check my interpretation of question)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
sid9221
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/Resistor.png

For the first bit first I solved the equation

[tex]\frac{dI}{dt}=\frac{U-RI}{L}[/tex]

[tex]I(t)=\frac{U-C_2e^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}[/tex]

Now I put in T(0)=0 to work out the constant and I got

[tex]I(t)=\frac{U-Ue^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}[/tex]

Now here's the dodgy bit, I did not do physics in my final years at school so I no clue what an "Ohmic Resistor" is but here is my interpretation of the question

[tex]I(t)=\frac{75U}{100R}[/tex]

Working that out I got

[tex]t = -L log(0.25)[/tex]

Now for the final part:

My interpretation was that the maximum saturation level was U/R=200/50=4

So I worked out:

[tex]I(t)= 3.5[/tex]

Which gave me t=90.31

Does what I have done make sense cause I don't know much "higher level" physics so am just working from logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
an ohmic resistor satisfies U=IR, so what you've done seems reasonable, though I haven't checked your numbers

one thing though, its always good practice to differentiate you solution, in this case I(t), and make sure it satisfies the original DE. I would recommend that check as usually the time constant in the exponential would depend on both R and L

Also you really need to know if they are in series or parallel, though it's implied by the DE..