Is this enough to get full marks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sa1988
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marks
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to solving a partial differential equation using separation of variables, specifically in the context of boundary value problems. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the adequacy of their solution for full marks, given the complexity of the problem and the marks allocated.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their attempts to solve the problem, including the application of boundary conditions and separation of variables. They question whether their approach and the amount of work shown are sufficient for the marks assigned. Other participants raise concerns about missing boundary conditions and the implications of certain conditions on the values of constants in the solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, providing feedback on the completeness of the boundary conditions and suggesting that certain assumptions may not hold. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in notation and the potential for marks to be lost due to ambiguity in the original poster's work.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a missing boundary condition that could significantly affect the solution process. The original poster acknowledges a potential oversight in their initial setup and is seeking clarification on the implications of their findings.

sa1988
Messages
221
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement



10sdhjr.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'd first like to apologise in advance because I may be making a few more threads like this. I have an exam on Tuesday and am looking at past papers which don't have any answers for me to check whether I'm doing the right thing, so I'm turning to the heroes of Physics Forums in my hour need.

For the above question I'm pretty sure I've done it correctly but I can't see how the work I've done is even remotely worth 30 marks.

Here's my working:

a)

##T(x,y) = T(x)T(y)##

Put into Laplace equation:

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}T(y) + \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}T(x) = 0##

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}\frac{1}{T(x)} + \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}\frac{1}{T(y)} = 0##

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}\frac{1}{T(x)} = - \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}\frac{1}{T(y)}##

Then for separation constant ##m^2## :

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2} = m^2 T(x)##

##\frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2} = -m^2 T(y)##

Done. Is that really worth 8 marks?

b)

By inspection I can already see the solutions:

##T(x) = Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx}##

##T(y) = Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy}##

So,

##T(x,y) = T(x)T(y) = (Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx})(Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy})##

Done. For 10 marks? I suppose I need to show the step by step working to get to those obvious solutions using the the usual ##f(x) = e^{\lambda x}## trial solution route? But even then it seems a bit simple for 10 marks.

c)

Boundary conditions are:
##T(0,0) = 0##
##T(x,0) = 0##
##T(x,L) = 0##
##T(L,y) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

These conditions give four equations:

##i. (A+B)(C+D) = 0##
##ii. (Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx})(C+D) = 0##
##iii. (A+B)(Ce^{imL}+De^{-imL}) = 0##
##iv. (Ae^{mL}+Be^{-mL})(Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Condition ##ii## leads to ##D = -C##
Condition ##iii## leads to ##B= -A##

These can then be put into condition ##iv##:

##AC(e^{mL}-e^{-mL})(e^{imy}-e^{-imy}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Then rewrite the exponentials in trig form:

##AC sinh(mL)sin(my) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Now this is clearly only possible for ##m = \frac{6\pi}{L}## and ##AC = \frac{1}{sinh(6\pi)}##,

leading to a full solution of:

##T(x,y) = \frac{sinh(\frac{6\pi x}{L})}{sinh(6\pi)}sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

I've checked this against the Laplace equation and it holds so I'm fairly sure it's correct. But it's a pretty easy 15 marks.

So overall I'm wondering if there's something I've done wrong? Should I be showing more step-by-step working or something? The 10-mark question is the biggest worry for me as it seemed far too easy. I'm convinced I missed something, yet I've come to the correct final answer at the end so what could possibly be penalised?

Thanks for any thoughts/opinions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first boundary condition is redundant, and you're missing a boundary condition. Condition iii doesn't imply A=-B.
 
vela said:
Your first boundary condition is redundant, and you're missing a boundary condition. Condition iii doesn't imply A=-B.

So I am missing something then.

I know the first condition was left unused, but I can't see how it was needed.

If condition ##iii## doesn't imply ##A=-B##, the only thing I could say is that it 'suggests':

##A=-B##
OR
##m=\frac{n\pi}{L}##
or both.

Similarly condition ##i## can only 'suggest':
##A=-B##
OR
##C=-D##
or both.

Is there some other route I should take to achieve values for A, B, C, D and m with certainty instead of having to use this loose 'trial guess' method?

And you say I'm missing another boundary condition altogether. Which condition is that?

Thanks.
 
Reread the problem. You'll see you left out the condition for one of the edges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
vela said:
Reread the problem. You'll see you left out the condition for one of the edges.

Ha. Christ. I see it now. That changes everything.

##i. T(0,y) = 0##
##ii. T(x,0) = 0##
##iii. T(x,L) = 0##
##iv. T(L,y) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

So,

##i. (A+B)(Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy}) = 0##

## \implies B = -A##

##ii. A(e^{mx}-e^{-mx})(C+D) = 0##

## \implies D = -C##

##iii. AC(e^{mx}-e^{-mx})(e^{imL}-e^{-imL}) = 0##

## \implies m = \frac{n\pi}{L}##, ##\Big( n\in \mathbb{N}\Big)##

##iv. AC(e^{n\pi}-e^{-n\pi})(e^{i\frac{n\pi y}{L}}-e^{-i\frac{n\pi y}{L}}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

rewrite ##iv## as trig:

##iv. ACsinh(n\pi)(sin(\frac{n\pi y}{L}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##
##\implies AC = \frac{1}{sinh(n\pi)}##
and
##n = 6##

Which gives the same answer as before.

But still, my error was only due to a tiny 'typo' so to speak. It still seems like a surprisingly small amount of steps across parts a, b and c to gain the full 30 marks.
 
In the last part, I'd say
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty A_n \sinh n\pi \sin \left(\frac{n \pi y}{L}\right) = \sin\left(\frac{6 \pi y}{L}\right),$$ from which you can conclude ##A_6 = \frac{1}{\sinh 6\pi}## and ##A_n=0## for ##n \ne 6##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
sa1988 said:

Homework Statement



10sdhjr.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'd first like to apologise in advance because I may be making a few more threads like this. I have an exam on Tuesday and am looking at past papers which don't have any answers for me to check whether I'm doing the right thing, so I'm turning to the heroes of Physics Forums in my hour need.

For the above question I'm pretty sure I've done it correctly but I can't see how the work I've done is even remotely worth 30 marks.

Here's my working:

a)

##T(x,y) = T(x)T(y)##

Put into Laplace equation:

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}T(y) + \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}T(x) = 0##

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}\frac{1}{T(x)} + \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}\frac{1}{T(y)} = 0##

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2}\frac{1}{T(x)} = - \frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2}\frac{1}{T(y)}##

Then for separation constant ##m^2## :

##\frac{d^2T(x)}{dx^2} = m^2 T(x)##

##\frac{d^2T(y)}{dy^2} = -m^2 T(y)##

Done. Is that really worth 8 marks?

b)

By inspection I can already see the solutions:

##T(x) = Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx}##

##T(y) = Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy}##

So,

##T(x,y) = T(x)T(y) = (Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx})(Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy})##

Done. For 10 marks? I suppose I need to show the step by step working to get to those obvious solutions using the the usual ##f(x) = e^{\lambda x}## trial solution route? But even then it seems a bit simple for 10 marks.

c)

Boundary conditions are:
##T(0,0) = 0##
##T(x,0) = 0##
##T(x,L) = 0##
##T(L,y) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

These conditions give four equations:

##i. (A+B)(C+D) = 0##
##ii. (Ae^{mx}+Be^{-mx})(C+D) = 0##
##iii. (A+B)(Ce^{imL}+De^{-imL}) = 0##
##iv. (Ae^{mL}+Be^{-mL})(Ce^{imy}+De^{-imy}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Condition ##ii## leads to ##D = -C##
Condition ##iii## leads to ##B= -A##

These can then be put into condition ##iv##:

##AC(e^{mL}-e^{-mL})(e^{imy}-e^{-imy}) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Then rewrite the exponentials in trig form:

##AC sinh(mL)sin(my) = sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

Now this is clearly only possible for ##m = \frac{6\pi}{L}## and ##AC = \frac{1}{sinh(6\pi)}##,

leading to a full solution of:

##T(x,y) = \frac{sinh(\frac{6\pi x}{L})}{sinh(6\pi)}sin(\frac{6\pi y}{L})##

I've checked this against the Laplace equation and it holds so I'm fairly sure it's correct. But it's a pretty easy 15 marks.

So overall I'm wondering if there's something I've done wrong? Should I be showing more step-by-step working or something? The 10-mark question is the biggest worry for me as it seemed far too easy. I'm convinced I missed something, yet I've come to the correct final answer at the end so what could possibly be penalised?

Thanks for any thoughts/opinions.

You would likely lose marks for using the exact symbol ##T## to stand for three different things in the same problem. Use better notation, such as ##T_1(x), T_2(y)## or ##F(x), G(y)## or something similar. It is never a good idea to make the marker work extra hard trying to decipher what you are doing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sa1988
vela said:
In the last part, I'd say
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty A_n \sinh n\pi \sin \left(\frac{n \pi y}{L}\right) = \sin\left(\frac{6 \pi y}{L}\right),$$ from which you can conclude ##A_6 = \frac{1}{\sinh 6\pi}## and ##A_n=0## for ##n \ne 6##.
Ray Vickson said:
You would likely lose marks for using the exact symbol ##T## to stand for three different things in the same problem. Use better notation, such as ##T_1(x), T_2(y)## or ##F(x), G(y)## or something similar. It is never a good idea to make the marker work extra hard trying to decipher what you are doing.

Thanks, duly noted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K