Ohmic Resistor modelling ?(Check my interpretation of question)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on modeling an Ohmic resistor using the differential equation \(\frac{dI}{dt}=\frac{U-RI}{L}\). The user derived the current function \(I(t)=\frac{U-Ue^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}\) and calculated the maximum saturation level as \(U/R=4\). The final current value was computed as \(I(t)=3.5\) with a corresponding time of \(t=90.31\). The importance of verifying the solution against the original differential equation and understanding the configuration of resistors (series or parallel) is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically first-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law, expressed as \(U=IR\).
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuits, including series and parallel configurations.
  • Concept of time constants in RC and RL circuits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of first-order linear differential equations in electrical engineering.
  • Learn about the behavior of resistors in series and parallel circuits.
  • Explore the concept of time constants in RL circuits and their implications on current over time.
  • Investigate the methods for verifying solutions to differential equations, including differentiation and substitution.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of Ohmic resistors and their mathematical modeling.

sid9221
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33103477/Resistor.png

For the first bit first I solved the equation

\frac{dI}{dt}=\frac{U-RI}{L}

I(t)=\frac{U-C_2e^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}

Now I put in T(0)=0 to work out the constant and I got

I(t)=\frac{U-Ue^{\frac{-t}{L}}}{R}

Now here's the dodgy bit, I did not do physics in my final years at school so I no clue what an "Ohmic Resistor" is but here is my interpretation of the question

I(t)=\frac{75U}{100R}

Working that out I got

t = -L log(0.25)

Now for the final part:

My interpretation was that the maximum saturation level was U/R=200/50=4

So I worked out:

I(t)= 3.5

Which gave me t=90.31

Does what I have done make sense cause I don't know much "higher level" physics so am just working from logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
an ohmic resistor satisfies U=IR, so what you've done seems reasonable, though I haven't checked your numbers

one thing though, its always good practice to differentiate you solution, in this case I(t), and make sure it satisfies the original DE. I would recommend that check as usually the time constant in the exponential would depend on both R and L

Also you really need to know if they are in series or parallel, though it's implied by the DE..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
997
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
823
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K