Ohm's Law graphing inversed gradient value

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around Ohm's Law, specifically focusing on the relationship between voltage and current in the context of graphing. Participants are exploring the implications of the gradient of the graph and its relation to resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of inverting the gradient value to determine resistance. There is also a discussion about the correct assignment of voltage and current on the graph axes.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the graphing process and the mathematical representation of Ohm's Law. Some guidance has been offered regarding the plotting of variables, but no consensus has been reached on the inversion of the gradient.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of plotting voltage against current and how this affects the interpretation of the gradient in relation to resistance. There may be assumptions about the linearity of the relationship that are being examined.

Casius
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
Relevant Equations
y = mx +c
Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Casius said:
Homework Statement:: Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
Relevant Equations:: y = mx +c
Of voltage and current, which are you plotting as y and which as x?
 
haruspex said:
Of voltage and current, which are you plotting as y and which as x?
Voltage x, current y
 
Casius said:
Voltage x, current y
So you have I=mV+c.
What would m be there?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
836
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K