Ohm's Law graphing inversed gradient value

AI Thread Summary
Ohm's Law states that the relationship between voltage and current in an ohmic device is linear, with the gradient representing resistance. When plotting current (I) against voltage (V), the equation I = mV + c shows that the slope (m) is the current per unit voltage. To find the resistance, the gradient must be inverted, as resistance is defined as voltage divided by current (R = V/I). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the axes in the graph to accurately interpret the gradient. Understanding this relationship is crucial for correctly applying Ohm's Law in practical scenarios.
Casius
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
Relevant Equations
y = mx +c
Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Casius said:
Homework Statement:: Hey all. This is about Ohm's Law (and specifically resistance). When you plot the change in current vs the change in voltage you should get a linear trend line (providing it is from an ohmic device). The gradient should be the resistance. My questions is why does the gradient value need to be inversed to find the true resistance value?
Relevant Equations:: y = mx +c
Of voltage and current, which are you plotting as y and which as x?
 
haruspex said:
Of voltage and current, which are you plotting as y and which as x?
Voltage x, current y
 
Casius said:
Voltage x, current y
So you have I=mV+c.
What would m be there?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top