On shell and off shell simultaneously?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shell
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of calculating one-loop virtual corrections in the Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) process, particularly concerning the treatment of on-shell and off-shell quarks. The participant is analyzing a scenario where an incoming quark emits a gluon before interacting with a photon, leading to a fermionic propagator. The key question is whether to treat the momentum of the quark as on-shell (p^2=0) or off-shell (p^2≠0) when evaluating the loop integral. It is noted that the diagram's structure suggests that the quark should remain on-shell, but the presence of off-shell terms in the denominators complicates the calculation. Ultimately, the discussion highlights that the diagram can be canceled with a UV counterterm, indicating that it may not need to be computed directly.
CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
I am considering the following one loop virtual correction in the DIS process.

OpgEl.png


where I have a quark of momentum ##p## coming in, emitting a gluon before interacting with a photon of momentum ##q## to produce a fermionic propagator with momentum ##p+q##. My question is, in the red box, I have an on shell initial or final state quark ##p^2=0## but in the green box I have an off shell fermionic quark propagator ##p^2 \neq 0##.

So, in my equations, in particular upon evaluation of the loop integral $$\int d^D l \frac{\text{Tr}( \not p \gamma^{\nu} (\not p + \not q) \dots)}{p^2 (p+q)^2 (p-l)^2}$$ where the denominators are all off shell terms, in simplifying the numerator (the trace results in dot products of all the momenta scales in the problem) would I use ##p^2=0## or ##p^2 \neq 0##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
p should be the same as p, I don't see how it could be off-shell if the gluon is connected as in the diagram.
 
mfb said:
p should be the same as p, I don't see how it could be off-shell if the gluon is connected as in the diagram.

I should have maybe drawn it with a cut through the propagator p+q. I want to compute the hadronic tensor for this diagram which is the discontinuity of the forward scattering process I showed. Does that make more sense in the set up?
 
Last edited:
This diagram, is the 1PI insertion onto the external leg.

Normally, the approach is to renormalise the wave functions in the on shell scheme.

In this set up, this diagram is canceled with that of the UV counterterm inserted onto this leg exactly.

In which case, you never need to calculate this diagram ever.

You would have to consider this gluon type attachment in the internal propagator. This would be off-shell, and would require the mass counterterm (the CT for a fermion propagator) to cancel the UV pole.
 
  • Like
Likes CAF123 and mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K