One can choose isothermal coordinates

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lavinia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Isothermal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of isothermal coordinates on smooth surfaces, exploring their physical interpretation, particularly in relation to temperature distribution and heat flow. Participants examine whether isothermal lines correspond to equilibrium temperature distributions and the implications of this on different surfaces, including spheres and thermally isolated systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that isothermal coordinates can be chosen in a neighborhood of any point on a smooth surface, prompting questions about their physical interpretation.
  • One participant proposes that isothermals do not represent equilibrium since heat must flow between them, indicating that equilibrium cannot exist in parts of a system.
  • Another participant mentions that while temperature distributions are continuous, they do not imply that heat does not flow, as equilibrium distributions can exist without constant temperature.
  • There is a suggestion that isothermal coordinates may be linked to thermodynamic systems, raising questions about the specific context, such as whether it involves gases or ideal gases.
  • One participant notes that isothermal lines are perpendicular to the heat flux vector, which varies with time, and discusses the implications for defining conformal coordinates.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the terminology of isothermal coordinates, indicating a lack of consensus on its standard usage in the context of heat transfer.
  • A later reply references the Dirichlet problem in relation to temperature distributions, suggesting a connection to the existence of isothermal coordinates on thermally isolated surfaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether isothermal coordinates imply equilibrium temperature distributions. Some argue against the idea of equilibrium in systems with multiple isothermals, while others suggest that equilibrium can exist in certain contexts. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of isothermal coordinates, particularly in relation to specific thermodynamic contexts and the definitions of equilibrium. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the physical systems being discussed.

lavinia
Science Advisor
Messages
3,385
Reaction score
760
On any smooth surface one can choose isothermal coordinates in a neighborhood of any point.
What is the physical interpretation of this fact?

Do the isothermals describe an equilibrium distribution of temperature? How would that be true say on a sphere?
 
Science news on Phys.org


If I understand your question, its basically just a mathematical approximation since the temperature distribution function is continuous. Basically the temperature can't jump, so if it is T at one point, it won't be too different from T at a point nearby.
 


Do the isothermals describe an equilibrium distribution of temperature? How would that be true say on a sphere?

No they do not describe equilibrium since as long as there is more than one isothermal heat must be flowing somewhere in the system. It flows from one isothermal to another, but does not flow along an isothermal.

You cannot have part of a system in equilibrium.
 


Curl said:
If I understand your question, its basically just a mathematical approximation since the temperature distribution function is continuous. Basically the temperature can't jump, so if it is T at one point, it won't be too different from T at a point nearby.

not sure what you mean. I didn't say that the distribution would be discontinuous.
 


Studiot said:
No they do not describe equilibrium since as long as there is more than one isothermal heat must be flowing somewhere in the system. It flows from one isothermal to another, but does not flow along an isothermal.

You cannot have part of a system in equilibrium.

equilibrium distributions of temperature that are not constant certainly exist. For an open planar region,they are solutions to the Dirichlet problem. Take a metal plate with some shape and keep its boundary at a constant temperature. eventually the temperature in the entire plate will be constant. this does not mean that heat does not flow. it means that the temperature doesn't change.
 


I guess another way to ask this question is , is there a physics proof for the existence of isothermal coordinates?
 


lavinia said:
I guess another way to ask this question is , is there a physics proof for the existence of isothermal coordinates?
It would be helpful if you were a little clearer on what you are talking about. Are you talking about co-ordinates P, V, and T for a thermodynamic system? Are you talking about a surface in this P-V-T space? What is the substance that we are dealing with? A gas? Ideal gas?

AM
 


Andrew Mason said:
It would be helpful if you were a little clearer on what you are talking about. Are you talking about co-ordinates P, V, and T for a thermodynamic system? Are you talking about a surface in this P-V-T space? What is the substance that we are dealing with? A gas? Ideal gas?

AM

I have been searching outside of this site and here is the answer.

On a surface that is thermally isolated isothermals are lines of constant temperature and are equal to constant coordinate lines in isothermal coordinates.

The physics proof might be that a surface that becomes thermally isolated achieves a constant temperature distribution. The isothermals determine isothermal coordinates and hence the complex structure. But I am guessing here.
 
Last edited:


I don't think AM meant this,
I think he was referring to something I also wondered about - the common use of 3D PVT diagrams (by chemical engineers in particular).
If we can follow a process along lines of constant temperature, pressure or volume to get from point A to point B in the diagram we have definite formula to perform the calculations on. General paths across surfaces in PVT space are not, in general calculable.
 
  • #10


lavinia said:
On any smooth surface one can choose isothermal coordinates in a neighborhood of any point.
What is the physical interpretation of this fact?
I don't understand what you mean by isothermal coordinates, plural.

In any heat flow situation, the heat flux vector at any point has a definite direction (which may vary with time of course), therefore on a surface the isothermal line through that point is at right angles to the heat flux. In 3 dimension the isothermal surface through the point is normal to the heat flux.

Those statements are true whether or not the heat flow is varying with time.

For thermal problems, "equlibrium" often means "the heat flux is not time dependent". That is not the same as "the temperature is constant everywhere".

In 2D, you can define a system of conformal coordinates where one set of coordinates are the isothermals, and the other set are aligned with the heat flux vectors. Is that what you meant by "isothermal coordinates"?
 
  • #11


AlephZero said:
I don't understand what you mean by isothermal coordinates, plural.

In any heat flow situation, the heat flux vector at any point has a definite direction (which may vary with time of course), therefore on a surface the isothermal line through that point is at right angles to the heat flux. In 3 dimension the isothermal surface through the point is normal to the heat flux.

Those statements are true whether or not the heat flow is varying with time.

For thermal problems, "equlibrium" often means "the heat flux is not time dependent". That is not the same as "the temperature is constant everywhere".

In 2D, you can define a system of conformal coordinates where one set of coordinates are the isothermals, and the other set are aligned with the heat flux vectors. Is that what you meant by "isothermal coordinates"?

I am sorry to have been vague. By temperature constant I meant constant in time. I thought that isothermal coordinates was standard terminology. I guess not although the term was invented by a physicist.

So the physics fact may be that a thermally isolated surface will reach an equilibrium where the temperature at each point is not changing in time. This reminds me of the Dirichlet problem.

It this were true - and this is why I asked this question in a physics thread rather than a mathematics thread - then it would prove the existence of isothermal coordinates on any surface.

I guess this also leads to the general problem of the long term asymptotic behavior of heat flow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K