cmb
- 1,128
- 128
NascentOxygen said:Alas... I stayed on to give you the benefit of the doubt, in case you had something insightful to say.
I am absolutely dumbfounded that you do not find my conclusion above fascinating.
I suppose we live in an age where everyone wants a soundbite, spoon fed to them.
The conclusion, that it doesn't matter how the energy is lost, it is the same amount of energy, is fascinating. In fact, I suppose it is a form of 'Gibbs free energy' type calculation, in which we look at the 'before' and 'after' state and recongise that both are defined, so the route to the end-point is immaterial.
The example given above with the spring is similarly so. Imagine you drop a mass on a spring, through lossy fluids, magnetic fields, whathaveyou that might impede its decent, yet at the end, once equilibrium is achieved, exactly the same amount of potential energy would have been expended.
I think that is fascinating. You don't? Time for you to move on to graze for your next sound-bite...