One coil twisted in a figure 8 vs. two coils side-by-side

In summary: Different shapes have different properties. The figure 8 has two loops, so it has twice the inductance of a simple coil. In fact, it has so much inductance that it can act as an inductor in an AC circuit, and it can be used to cancel out capacitance. If you have two coils in series, each with the same number of turns, the figure 8 will have more inductance than either coil. The mutual inductance between the loops is zero, so there is no net inductance.
  • #1
Thelonious Monk
14
1
The side by side coils are round or oval, and wired together in series. Let's say the side by side coils are wound opposite (one clockwise and one counterclockwise) to match the direction of travel of the twisted coil's loops. Each of the side by side coils has the same number of turns as the twisted coil. All other parameters (wire gauge, etc.) are the same. Are these functionally identical in every way, or would there be a difference? If there is a difference, what would it be? Would there be mutual inductance between the loops of the fig 8 even though they are not separate coils?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't understand your first two questions. For #3, if you were to calculate the inductance of the figure 8 you would sum the inductances of each loop plus the mutual inductance between them. Just like doing any inductance calculation.
 
  • #3
How would you measure the inductance of one loop of a twisted coil? With two coils in series, it's easy enough to separate them into two circuits and test each one; with one coil in a figure 8, each loop can not be separated into its own circuit.
 
  • #4
Read my post, I said calculate.
EDIT: On second thought, maybe you are asking how you would measure one coil to compare to a calculation. You would have to wind a coil that had the closest geometry possible to one half of the 8, and account for any errors or differences.
 
  • #5
I read what you wrote... what I was asking was how I would get those figures to begin with (inductance of each loop and the mutual inductance) to be able to make the calculation. You didn't say to calculate those.

What I'm after, mainly, though is to find if the fig 8 would behave any differently than two opposite-direction coils side by side, in any way at all (capacitance, reactance, etc.). I expect they're nearly identical, but I imagine there would have to be some difference. The path of the electrons will be completely different-- in the 8, they go around one loop, then the other, back and forth, while in the coil pair, they go round and round one completely then round and round the other. In an AC signal, they'll go both directions, but it's still along a different path. I just wonder if that has any consequences, even subtle ones, that would be measurable. I'm sorry this is so vague.
 
  • #6
The inductance of a circular loop is available in closed form (the formula includes elliptic integrals), which you can find through Google search. The mutual inductance of co-planar coils, on the other hand, is probably not available in closed form. Your best bet is to use a numerical simulation package, which has the benefit of including the effects of parasitic capacitance. HFSS and COMSOL are names of popular codes. How close you get to a figure 8 depends on details of the geometry (for example, exactly what the crossover region looks like) and, especially, what the frequency is. At high frequencies, small differences between model and actual become important. If you are doing numerical simulation, then your can input the exact geometry of the 8.
 

1. What is the difference between one coil twisted in a figure 8 and two coils side-by-side?

The main difference between one coil twisted in a figure 8 and two coils side-by-side is the way the magnetic field is created. In one coil twisted in a figure 8, the magnetic field lines are concentrated and cross over each other, while in two coils side-by-side, the magnetic field lines are parallel and do not cross over.

2. Which configuration is more efficient for creating a magnetic field?

In terms of efficiency, two coils side-by-side is generally more efficient for creating a magnetic field. This is because the parallel configuration allows for a stronger and more uniform magnetic field to be generated.

3. How does the number of turns in each coil affect the magnetic field?

The number of turns in each coil directly affects the strength of the magnetic field. The more turns in a coil, the stronger the magnetic field will be. This is because each turn adds to the overall magnetic field produced.

4. Is one configuration better for specific applications?

Both configurations have their own advantages and disadvantages depending on the specific application. For example, one coil twisted in a figure 8 may be better for creating a more concentrated and directional magnetic field, while two coils side-by-side may be better for creating a larger and more uniform magnetic field.

5. Are there any safety concerns with using either configuration?

As with any application involving electricity and magnetic fields, safety is always a concern. However, the safety concerns for using one coil twisted in a figure 8 or two coils side-by-side are similar. It is important to follow proper safety protocols and guidelines when working with either configuration.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top