One-dimensional potential well problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the one-dimensional potential well problem, where a particle is confined within a potential defined by infinite walls and a finite barrier. The initial assumption that the wavefunction is zero outside the well is correct, but the proposed form of the wavefunction inside the well needs revision to include both positive and negative exponential terms. The boundary conditions require that the wavefunction be continuous at the edges of the well, leading to a sine wave representation. The confusion regarding the radius stems from the need to apply continuity conditions for the wavefunctions across the boundaries. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying quantum mechanics principles to analyze the potential well scenario.
Ruddiger27
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
My head's melting right now, because I've been stuck on this for the past 6 hours.
There's a particle of mass moving in a potential well where
V(x) = infinity at x<0
V(X)=0, 0<x<a
V(x)= Vo, x>a

Vo>0
E<Vo

I'm assuming that the wavefunction at x<0 is 0, since there's an infinite potential there. The energy inside the potential well is just the kinetic energy, =(Hk)^2/2m, where H=h/2pi, so the wavefunction should be of the form
psi= Aexp(-ikx )
Now outside the well, at x>a, the energy should be E= Vo-Ek because the particle is bound in the well. We then get psi=Bexp(-Tx), where T is k with (Vo-E) instead of E.
Am I wrong in assuming this? When I try to find the radius using
X^2 + y^2 = R^2, where x=k=a*sqrt(2mE)/H and y=ai*(sqrt(2m(Vo-E))/H
I get out a negative radius.
Please help me see what I've done wrong, I'm sure I've got the energy value on the finite potential side wrong, but I can't see how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haven't gone through your entire question to know if this is the only mistake, but I believe you made a mistake determining psi in the well.

When you solve the differential equation you should get a couple exponentials...something like

psi=A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx).

Remember these are complex exponentials so they don't blow up at infinity and you can't eliminate terms like with real exponentials.

Now your boundary conditions require that psi=0 for x</= 0, so plugging in 0 for x we get A+B=0, and hence A=-B, and psi is some sort of sine wave of the form
psi=A(exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx))

I haven't gone through the rest of your problem, and I'm not sure what radius you are referring to at the end.
 
The radius comes in when we look at the wavefunctions across x=a, where they should be continuous, so psi1=psi2 and dpsi1/dx=dpsi2/dx. I have to divide one by the other to get a solution in the form -y=xcot(x), then rearrange the circle equation to get y, sub it in and the intersection gives the solution.
 
Ok thanks, you've really helped me out, the website was especially helpful.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top