One more try at epsilon-delta limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter KiwiKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit lim[x->5] 3x^2 - 1 = 74 using epsilon-delta definitions. The user outlines their approach by establishing the relationship |3x^2 - 1 - 74| < ε and deriving δ in terms of ε. They define C as a constant to bound |x + 5|, ultimately concluding that δ=min{1, ε/33} is necessary for the proof. The user expresses confusion about the need to find a specific value for C versus simply demonstrating its existence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of epsilon-delta definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and limits
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and inequalities
  • Experience with calculus textbooks, particularly Stewart's Calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Learn how to manipulate inequalities in calculus proofs
  • Explore the concept of bounding constants in mathematical proofs
  • Practice additional limit proofs using various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those learning about limits and mathematical proofs, as well as educators looking for examples of epsilon-delta limit proofs.

KiwiKid
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that lim[x->5] 3x^2 - 1 = 74

Homework Equations


Epsilon-delta stuff.

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so first we have to find delta in terms of epsilon, and this is particularly sucky because it's a nonlinear function. Here's my attempt:

|3x^2 - 1 - 74| = |3||x - 5||x + 5| < ε → |x - 5||x + 5| < ε/3
Define C > |x + 5| → |x + 5||x - 5| < C|x - 5|
Define |x - 5| < ε/(3C) = δ

Now we have to find an actual value for C, so let's put a boundary of 1 on δ:

|x - 5| < 1 → |x + 5| < 11
C = 11

Now here's my attempt at the actual proof:

Let ε > 0, δ=min{1, ε/(3C)}=min{1, ε/33}
|3x^2 - 75| = |3||x + 5||x - 5| < 3 * 11 * ε/(3C) = 33 * ε/33 = ε
Therefore |x - 5| < δ implies |(3x^2 - 1) - 74| < ε
Ergo lim[x->5] 3x^2 - 1 = 74

Does that sound about right? I have the feeling that my proof might be missing a few bits. I also don't completely understand why I have to say δ=min{1, ε/33}. I suppose there's a specific reason δ=ε/33 won't work, but I don't see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you "need to find" a value for C? Showing that C exists is sufficient.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Why do you "need to find" a value for C? Showing that C exists is sufficient.

*scratches head* Now that you mention it, I don't know. I take it I don't need to know a value for C because it ends up as 3*|x + 5||x - 5| < 3*C*ε/C, where the C's cancel each other out?

But, uhm, I don't really know. As I've said in a few posts before this one, I'm very unfamiliar with mathematical proofs, as most of what I've done before was of the 'just plug in numbers'-kind. I tried to do this as close to the book (Stewart's Calculus) as I could. I find it all very vague. On the one hand you need to *find* numbers, but on the other people keep talking about how you simply *define* all constants to mean I-don't-know-what.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K