Op amp transfer function incorporating output impedance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the transfer function of a simple inverting operational amplifier (op amp) topology while incorporating the output impedance (Ro) of a non-ideal op amp. The derived transfer function is expressed as vo(s)/vi(s) = -A*RF / ((R1+RF)*(s*CL*Ro*RF+(Ro+RF)) + A*R1). The user, Jorge, encounters difficulties in obtaining a valid result, particularly in accounting for the frequency-dependent component involving Ro. Another participant, NascentOxygen, suggests modeling the op amp with a realistic frequency-dependent gain to resolve the issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operational amplifier (op amp) fundamentals
  • Familiarity with transfer functions and Laplace transforms
  • Knowledge of circuit analysis techniques, including superposition and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Basic concepts of frequency response and gain roll-off in op amps
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the frequency-dependent gain model of op amps, specifically focusing on the open-loop gain characteristics
  • Study the implications of output impedance in op amp circuits and its effect on stability
  • Learn about the impact of load capacitance on circuit behavior, particularly in feedback systems
  • Explore advanced circuit simulation tools to model non-ideal op amp behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students studying analog electronics who are looking to deepen their understanding of op amp behavior in real-world applications.

jrive
Messages
58
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I was trying to derive the transfer function of a simple inverting op amp topology, incorporating the output impedance, Ro, of the non-ideal op amp, to see how it, when combined with a load capacitance can induce oscillations (or at least ringing). I haven't been able to get a valid answer --could be bookkeeping errors with the math, or just that my set up is incorrect for deriving the circuit's transfer function. Refer to the attached picture.

Using Laplace, the xfer function I end up with is:
\frac{vo(s)}{vi(s)}=\frac{-A*RF}{(R1+RF)*(s*CL*Ro*RF+(Ro+RF))+A*R1}

If A is really big...this simplifies to -RF/R1, which is sort-of expected for negligible Ro. However, I expected the frequency dependent component (which includes RO) to be part this result even as A is big, so I must be doing something wrong somewhere.

I suspect it has to do with the derivation of the xfer function using A(Vp-Vn). Basically, I obtain Vn via superposition of the contributions from Vin and Vo as \frac{(V1*RF +Vo*R1)}{(R1+RF)}, Vp =0, and then use KVL at the Vo node...That is...

\frac{-A*Vn-Vo}{Ro}+ \frac{(Vn-Vo)}{RF}=Vo*s*CL...I then sub in the equation for Vn above and solve for Vo/Vin...

Any help is appreciated...
Jorge
 

Attachments

  • opamp_ro.png
    opamp_ro.png
    16.9 KB · Views: 578
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi jrive! That looks like it will be a first-order system, so you won't get any oscillations out of that. You should model the op-amp more realistically. At least give it a gain that falls off with frequency, a single pole giving A₀/(1 + jω/ω₀). Typically, ω₀ is something like 100Hz, but if you look at the data sheet you'll see the corner frequency of its open loop gain.
 
yep...you're right NascentOxygen...thanks for pointing that out...I'll give that a shot to see if my math works out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K