Open loop rankine cycle with no condenser

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using an open loop Rankine cycle without a condenser for a small-scale parabolic trough concentrator project aimed at generating electricity for irrigation. The primary concern is the potential decrease in efficiency due to venting exhaust steam directly into the atmosphere. Participants highlight that while removing the condenser may reduce costs, it also leads to significant efficiency losses, which could impact water delivery to crops. The consensus suggests that while the system's simplicity is essential, the trade-off between cost savings and efficiency must be carefully evaluated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rankine cycle thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with parabolic trough concentrator technology
  • Knowledge of steam generation and condensation processes
  • Basic principles of irrigation systems and water management
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency metrics of open loop Rankine cycles without condensers
  • Explore alternative steam condensation methods that may be cost-effective
  • Investigate the impact of steam venting on irrigation efficiency
  • Learn about small-scale renewable energy systems for rural applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, renewable energy developers, and agricultural technologists interested in optimizing irrigation systems using innovative energy solutions.

sam_89
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm working on a small scale parabolic trough concentrator project to generate electricity.
This electricity is used for pumping water for irrigation,and I want to use an open loop Rankine cycle with no condenser(if it is applicable),to reduce cost,with the steam exhausting directly into the atmosphere.
So is it applicable? and how much the efficiency is decreased in this case?
Please provide me with detailed explanation if possible

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you are trying to power an irrigation system, it would seem that the amount of water available is rather limited. Venting exhaust steam to atmosphere would be rather wasteful in this situation, IMO, and would reduce the amount of water actually delivered to the crop.
 
This is a small scale project,the surface of the terrain is small,the system will function a few hours,so the amount of water lost is not huge.the idea is to check if removing the condenser and saving its cost, is beneficial in this application or not,although the efficiency of the rankine cycle will decrease .The question is how much will it decrease and is it worth removing the condenser ,in this case.
This system need to be as simple as possible,It will be used in rural areas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K