Operators and Complete State Descriptions in Quantum Mechanics

black_kitty
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What for do we need operators in QM. Where is the complete state description of a quantum object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't *need* operators--for example, Feynman's path integral approach to quantum mechanics only uses regular old numbers (no operators)... Of course, you may not like path integrals any better than operators since they are not really well-defined mathematically.
 
black_kitty said:
What for do we need operators in QM. Where is the complete state description of a quantum object?

P.A.M. Dirac, “The Principles of Quantum Mechanics”, 4-th edition, Oxford, (1958).

The Hilbert spaces are perfectly defined mathematical structures.

Regards, Dany.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top