Operators in quantum mechanics

Mk7492
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
We know the convergence of a series but what does it mean to say that "an operator converges or diverges"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more context?
 
It's about the 'Propogator' of 1-D box ( -L/2 to +L/2) which is an exponential operator power series.
 
$ U = e^{{ \frac{i \hbar t} {2m}} {\frac{d^2} {dx^2} }} $
bhobba said:
It means it converges in some norm, or maybe by weak convergence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_convergence_(Hilbert_space)

I don't know the norm used here, my suspicion is its the weak convergence of distribution theory which would be something like On|u> converges weakly to O|u> for all |u>.

However convergence in path integrals is a difficult issue requiring some pretty advanced math (eg Hida Distributions):
http://www.mathnet.or.kr/mathnet/kms_tex/99937.pdf

Thanks
Bill
I don't know what weak convergence is. I was reading R.Shankar's "Principle's of Quantum mechanics " & i encountered the above question. Can you suggest me the math i need to know in order to understand QM.
Thankyou for the reply.
 
Mk7492 said:
I don't know what weak convergence is. I was reading R.Shankar's "Principle's of Quantum mechanics " & i encountered the above question. Can you suggest me the math i need to know in order to understand QM.

Read Chapter 1 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9814578584/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In the context of an inner product space the idea of weak convergence is fairly simple.

A sequence |an> converges to |a> if for all <b| in the space <b|an> converges to <b|a>.

Strong convergence is convergence in the norm ie |an> converges to |a> if ||an - a|| converges to zero.

Weak convergence of operators is On converges to O if On|a> converges in the weak sense to to O|a> for all |a>

For normal Hilbert spaces they are equivalent but there are spaces of great practical interest where its not the case. In particular that applies to what's called distribution theory. Its so useful it should really be part of the armoury of any physicist or applied mathematician. The best book I know to learn it from is:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521558905/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It for example makes the theory of Fourier transforms a snap. It makes use of weak convergence to ensure, for example, the Fourier transform of a convergent sequence itself always converges..

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top