Operators in quantum mechanics

Mk7492
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
We know the convergence of a series but what does it mean to say that "an operator converges or diverges"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more context?
 
It's about the 'Propogator' of 1-D box ( -L/2 to +L/2) which is an exponential operator power series.
 
$ U = e^{{ \frac{i \hbar t} {2m}} {\frac{d^2} {dx^2} }} $
bhobba said:
It means it converges in some norm, or maybe by weak convergence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_convergence_(Hilbert_space)

I don't know the norm used here, my suspicion is its the weak convergence of distribution theory which would be something like On|u> converges weakly to O|u> for all |u>.

However convergence in path integrals is a difficult issue requiring some pretty advanced math (eg Hida Distributions):
http://www.mathnet.or.kr/mathnet/kms_tex/99937.pdf

Thanks
Bill
I don't know what weak convergence is. I was reading R.Shankar's "Principle's of Quantum mechanics " & i encountered the above question. Can you suggest me the math i need to know in order to understand QM.
Thankyou for the reply.
 
Mk7492 said:
I don't know what weak convergence is. I was reading R.Shankar's "Principle's of Quantum mechanics " & i encountered the above question. Can you suggest me the math i need to know in order to understand QM.

Read Chapter 1 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/9814578584/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In the context of an inner product space the idea of weak convergence is fairly simple.

A sequence |an> converges to |a> if for all <b| in the space <b|an> converges to <b|a>.

Strong convergence is convergence in the norm ie |an> converges to |a> if ||an - a|| converges to zero.

Weak convergence of operators is On converges to O if On|a> converges in the weak sense to to O|a> for all |a>

For normal Hilbert spaces they are equivalent but there are spaces of great practical interest where its not the case. In particular that applies to what's called distribution theory. Its so useful it should really be part of the armoury of any physicist or applied mathematician. The best book I know to learn it from is:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521558905/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It for example makes the theory of Fourier transforms a snap. It makes use of weak convergence to ensure, for example, the Fourier transform of a convergent sequence itself always converges..

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top