Opinion on Lockheed Martin's fusion "breakthrough"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenstr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion
Glenstr
Messages
77
Reaction score
34
I've been following this with interest, and would like the opinion on those here with a lot more knowledge of the subject than I am.

Depending on what you read, this is technology that will be available within a decade, or it's a pipe dream many decades away.

Is it something we'll see in our lifetimes?

In any event, should it pan out even close to the way they say in http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/15/us-lockheed-fusion-idUSKCN0I41EM20141015, I can see the changes it would bring as monumental.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks - I'll read & follow that thread then. I thought I read about a breakthrough since then - but it was just an old article rehashed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top