Opinion Please: Which of These LED Drive Circuit is Best?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating two variations of an LED drive circuit, specifically focusing on their design and functionality in relation to a voltage monitoring application. Participants explore circuit configurations, transistor biasing, and the operational behavior of the LED indicator based on voltage levels.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the advantages of two circuit variations for an LED indicator that turns on below 11V, emphasizing the need for specific transistor biasing.
  • Another participant suggests modifications to the second circuit, advocating for a PNP BJT for high-side switching and proposing a connection change to improve functionality.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the proposed changes, clarifying that the LED should remain off above 11V and that Q1 is intended to function as an inverter.
  • Further clarification is provided, indicating that the second circuit would not function as intended due to biasing issues with Q1, suggesting the addition of another NPN transistor for proper inversion.
  • A participant reports success with a modified design, indicating that it now functions correctly for the intended voltage monitoring application, while acknowledging the complexity of high-side switching.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of the proposed circuit modifications, with some suggesting changes while others question their necessity. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the optimal circuit design.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific circuit configurations and operational conditions, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the exact biasing requirements and the implications of high-side versus low-side switching.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in circuit design, particularly those working with LED indicators and voltage monitoring applications, may find this discussion relevant.

jmcafee
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Your opinion, please. Does one of the two variations of this circuit offer a clear advantage, or is it a wash (see attached)?

This indicator circuit turns on the LED below 11V (set by the zener). The LED cathode must be at ground (it is actually part of a tri-color LED with a common cathode), so it cannot be in the collector circuit of an NPN.

Any suggestions on the transistor biasing?

Thanks for your comments.
 

Attachments

  • Schematic.gif
    Schematic.gif
    6.8 KB · Views: 531
Engineering news on Phys.org
The 2nd circuit is closest, but still not quite right. Thematically, you use a PNP BJT for high-side switches, as the 2nd circuit does. But the first NPN transistor Q1 should have its collector connected to Q3's base through the resistor, so that when Q1 turns on, it pulls down on Q3's base to turn it on. Re-draw the 2nd circuit that way, and re-simulate. Should work a lot better.

Welcome to the PF, BTW!
 
Thanks for the suggestion, Mike.
 
Thinking further about what you said, I'm not sure that your proposed action is what I need functionally (or maybe I don't understand). To reiterate, the LED is to be OFF above 11V.

I'm using Q1 as an inverter; when it is on, I want Q3 off (and the reciprocal). So I don't want to pull the Q3 base low when Q1 is saturated.
 
Last edited:
jmcafee said:
Thinking further about what you said, I'm not sure that your proposed action is what I need functionally (or maybe I don't understand). To reiterate, the LED is to be OFF above 11V.

I'm using Q1 as an inverter; when it is on, I want Q3 off (and the reciprocal). So I don't want to pull the Q3 base low when Q1 is saturated.

Ah, my bad, I missed where you mentioned the polarity. But circuit #2 still won't work, because Q1 can't pull its emitter up high enough to turn off Q3, given its base biasing. I'd suggest using an additional transistor instead -- use the configuration I mentioned in my previous post, and add an extra NPN stage in the middle to do the inversion.
 
Mike,

Thanks very much! This may not be exactly what you envisioned, but I'm sure it is close. Regardless, it now functions perfectly (my original design would never turn off the red LED).

I've attached the full schematic. It is a voltage monitor using a single LED indicator that lights red at 10-11.2V, amber at 11.2-12.2V, and green above 12.2V.

I learned an important lesson from you that high side switching is trickier to design than low side switching.

Jim
 

Attachments

  • Schematic full.gif
    Schematic full.gif
    15 KB · Views: 547
jmcafee said:
Mike,

Thanks very much! This may not be exactly what you envisioned, but I'm sure it is close. Regardless, it now functions perfectly (my original design would never turn off the red LED).

I've attached the full schematic. It is a voltage monitor using a single LED indicator that lights red at 10-11.2V, amber at 11.2-12.2V, and green above 12.2V.

I learned an important lesson from you that high side switching is trickier to design than low side switching.

Jim

Nice work, Jim. I'd say you have a future in circuit design! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
27K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K