Optical light transmission through a coating

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the optical transmission of light through a coated piece of glass, specifically comparing the transmission when light is incident on the coated side versus the uncoated side. The scope includes theoretical considerations and practical implications related to light scattering and transmission properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the optical transmission will differ based on the side of incidence, noting uncertainty due to a lack of physics background.
  • Another participant suggests using simulation software, like LightTools, to analyze the effects of different coatings and materials on light transmission.
  • A third participant draws a parallel to imaging through turbulence, suggesting that transmission may be similar unless the coating is highly scattering, which could affect total internal reflection at the glass-air interface.
  • Another contribution emphasizes that if the focus is on relative spectral transmission, the results may be similar, particularly if the coating is thick relative to the wavelength, but highlights that absolute power and field direction could vary significantly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the transmission characteristics will be the same or different depending on the side of incidence, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the specific properties of the coating, such as its thickness and scattering characteristics, which are not fully defined in the discussion.

0kensai0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I was to measure the transmission of light through a coated piece of glass(with a coating designed to scatter light). Do I expect the optical transmission to be different if the light is incident upon the coated side compared to if the light is incident on the uncoated side and exits through the coated side??

Our resident spectroscoper said I should expect the same transmission, but we're unsure as to why (since we're a bunch of chemists with limited physics background)

Can anyone shed some light on this matter.

thanks beforehand
 
Science news on Phys.org
I do not know the answer to your problem but I am sure that you can analyze it in simulation software such as lighttools. You can see the difference if coating is changed, or materials are changed or the shape. One way ahead is optimization using this software.
 
That's an interesting question. Have you measured any difference?

The reason it's interesting is because a similar phenomenon occurs in imaging through turbulence- satellites looking down at the Earth (with the scattering surface far away from the scope, and close to the object) can image well, while earth-bound telescopes looking up (through the nearby scattering medium, at the distant object) have problems. The same phenomenon can occur with fogged shower doors.

However, imaging is different than simple transmission. My suspicion is that the transmission will be very similar, unless the coating is highly scattering- enough to place a significant fraction of the incident light into the total internal reflection regime at the glass-air interface.
 
I guess it depends more on the specifics of what you're talking about. If you're just concerned about relative spectral transmission (i.e., the shape of the spectrum in wavelength space), it will be more or less the same, especially if the coating is thick compared to the wavelength. But if you're concerned about the shape and direction of the field, or the absolute power, that's not necessarily the case. For example, if your "coating" was a beamsplitter oriented 45 degrees from the surface, it one direction it would send half the light propagating to the left, while the other would send half the light propagating to the right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
20K
Replies
10
Views
5K