Optics & Resolution: Can I See the Peak?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Resolution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the visibility of a spectral peak at 100 MHz with a resolution of Δλ 0.5 nm. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) is confirmed to be 100 MHz, and the mean wavelength is approximately 500 nm. To assess peak visibility, it is essential to convert the FWHM into a wavelength range and compare it with the spectrometer's wavelength resolution. The condition Δf/f > Δλ/λ must be satisfied to resolve the peak, where Δf is the FWHM and Δλ is the spectrometer resolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spectral resolution and FWHM
  • Knowledge of wavelength and frequency conversion
  • Familiarity with the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and the speed of light
  • Basic principles of optics and spectroscopy
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about converting frequency to wavelength and vice versa
  • Study the principles of spectral resolution in optics
  • Research the impact of medium on the speed of light and its effect on measurements
  • Explore advanced spectrometer specifications and their implications for peak detection
USEFUL FOR

Optical physicists, spectroscopists, and anyone involved in analyzing spectral data and optimizing spectrometer performance.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

Say I have a peak of about 100 MHz, and my apparature has a resolution of about Δλ 0.5 nm. How can I find out whether I will see the peak or not?
 
Science news on Phys.org
It's not clear from your post: is the peak located at 100MHz, or is that the full width half maximum? You have a certain wavelength resolution, but what is the mean wavelength?
 
100 MHz is the FWHM. We are in the visible range, so λ ~ 500 nm (sorry, I should have specified that first).
 
Ok.

Here's what I would do: convert the FWHM into a wavelength range: do this by converting 500nm into frequency, then add +/- 50 MHz, and convert back to wavelengths. Then you can compare directly with the wavelength resolution of your spectrometer.

Something to keep in mind- detecting the peak is different than resolving the peak width.
 
I would compare Δf/f (=λ·Δf/c) with Δλ/λ (=0.001).

You need Δf/f > Δλ/λ in order to resolve the peak.

(In case it's not clear from the context of this thread, Δf is the FWHM of the peak, and Δλ is the spectrometer resolution.)
 
Thanks to both of you. Redbelly98, isn't Δf/f =λ·Δf/c only valid in vacuum?
 
Strictly speaking, yes. It's a reasonable approximation in air as well. What medium does your spectrometer operate in?
 
In air. But what is the general version of λf =c?
 
The speed of light in a medium is c/n, so
λf =c/n
where λ is the wavelength in the medium.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K