Optics - Transmission of plane wave at oblique incidence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transmission of a plane wave at oblique incidence, specifically focusing on the direction of electric field oscillations and the change in the propagation vector when transitioning between two dielectric media with different permittivities.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the direction of electric field oscillations from the given plane wave equation.
  • Another participant suggests using Snell's law to find the x and y components of the transmitted wave's propagation vector, noting a change in magnitude based on the dielectric constants.
  • A third participant points out that the original equation lacks directionality and proposes a modified form to clarify the direction of the electric field.
  • A later reply agrees with the interpretation of unit vectors in the electric field expression and suggests using vector addition rules to deduce the direction of oscillations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the direction of electric field oscillations, with some proposing different interpretations of the plane wave equation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the complete understanding of the electric field direction and the propagation vector's vectorial form.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the original equation, and participants have differing views on how to interpret the components of the electric field and the propagation vector. The discussion also highlights dependencies on the definitions of the unit vectors involved.

Flexington
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have 2 questions that need help with,

Considering the following plane wave,

E= 30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

firstly how can i deduce the direction of the electric field oscillations?
And finally, if the wave is incident on a dielectric interface between medium of Er=2 and second Er=3. How can i find the change in propagation vector of the transmitted wave.

My attempt is that i can resolve the propagation vector from its components in the x and z direction from -0.5x + 0.866z, which gives 60 degrees and that the change in magnitude of the propagation vector depends only on the dielectric constants such that,

K[/SUB]2[/SUB] = 3K1/2
(K is mag of propagation vector)
However, to express it back in vectorial form I am lost.


Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
Ok, so i have the 2nd part regarding the propagation vector. I can use the angle of refraction, from snells law, to find the x and y components of the transmitted waves propagation vector, with the new magnitude 3/2. As the mgnitude in meda one was 1.

Howver i am still baffled with how i can deduce the direction of oscillations of the electric field?
 
The equation you wrote down has no directionality, so it is no wonder you are having a hard time finding it. As written, your equation is not complete. If it were written:

E=x30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

then the E field would be pointing in the x direction
 
Flexington said:
Considering the following plane wave,

E= 30 (0.866 i + 0.5k)exp{i(-0.5x + 0.866z)}

firstly how can i deduce the direction of the electric field oscillations?

In (0.866i + 0.5k), I suspect that i and k are unit vectors in the x and z directions respectively. If so, the direction of the indicated sum is given by the usual rules for vector addition.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K