1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Optimization problem using derivatives

  1. Apr 8, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    We want to make a conical drinking cup out of paper. It should hold exactly 100 cubic inches of water. Find the dimensions of a cup of this type that minimizes the surface area.

    2. Relevant equations
    SA = pi*r^2 + pi*r*l where l is the slant height of the cone.

    V = 1/3pi*r^2*h = 100

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I solve l in terms of h and r.

    l = sqrt(r^2 + h^2)

    Then I solve h in terms of r in the volume, and I get:

    h = 300/pi*r^2

    plugging this equation for h back in the equation for l, I get:

    l = sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

    SA(r) = pi*r^2 + pi*r*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

    Then taking the derivative and setting it equal to zero:

    SA'(r) = 2pi*r + pi*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)) + 1/2*pi*r/(sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)))*(2r + 600/(pi*r^3)) = 0

    Instead of trying to solve that ugly thing myself I plugged it into wolfram and it said no real solutions exist so I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any help pleasE?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 8, 2013 #2

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    How can you drink from the cup when you have the lid on???
     
  4. Apr 8, 2013 #3
    Man, I hate math... lol. Thanks.
     
  5. Apr 8, 2013 #4
    Is there also an easier way to do this than the way I'm doing it? I get such long, ugly derivatives and finding the zeros is really tedious and time consuming... This is an exam review problem so I don't think the problem should take this long. Is there another approach I could use?

    edit: I do get the right answer though, despite it taking a long time.
     
  6. Apr 8, 2013 #5

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    1. What you consider "long time" might not be felt like "long time" by others
    2. Since you haven't really, posted the manner in which you've done your algebraic manipulations, noone can give you a "short cut", because we cannot see the algebraic pathways you actually chose to walk along..
     
  7. Apr 8, 2013 #6
  8. Apr 8, 2013 #7

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Well, lets see if I can simplify the algebra a bit, on the spur of the moment:
    [tex]\frac{dl}{dr}=\frac{r+h\frac{dh}{dr}}{l}[/tex]
    Thus, the optimizing equation becomes, effectively:
    [tex]l+r\frac{dl}{dr}=0[/tex]
    That is:
    [tex]l^{2}+r^{2}+rh\frac{dh}{dr}=0 (*)[/tex]
    Furthermore, we have:
    [tex]\frac{dh}{dr}=-\frac{2}{r}h[/tex]
    therefore, (*) transmutes to:
    [tex]2r^{2}-h^{2}=0[/tex]

    This ought to be correct simplfication.
     
  9. Apr 8, 2013 #8

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Since [tex]h=\frac{3V}{\pi{r^{2}}}[/tex], we have:
    [tex]r^{3}=\frac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}[/tex]
    that is,
    [tex]r=(\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}\pi})^{\frac{1}{3}}V^{\frac{1}{3}}[/tex]
    as our relation for minimized surface, given fixed volume of the open cone.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2013
  10. Apr 8, 2013 #9
    I would have never thought of doing it in that way..

    Thanks for the insight and taking the time to help me..
     
  11. Apr 8, 2013 #10

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Very often, retaining symbols for butt-ugly expressions will simplify the computation relative to substituting the symbol with original butt-ugliness. :smile:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted