Optimization problem using derivatives

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the dimensions of a conical drinking cup made from paper, which must hold a specific volume of 100 cubic inches. The objective is to minimize the surface area of the cup, with relevant equations provided for surface area and volume.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the slant height in terms of the radius and height, and subsequently derives an equation for surface area in terms of radius. They express concern over the complexity of the derivative and the lack of real solutions.
  • Some participants question the practicality of drinking from a cup with a lid, while others express frustration with the lengthy calculations involved in finding the derivative.
  • There are suggestions for alternative approaches to simplify the problem, with some participants discussing the algebraic manipulations involved in the optimization process.
  • One participant offers a different perspective on the relationship between radius and height, proposing a formula for minimized surface area based on fixed volume.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of the problem as it is part of an exam review, which may imply constraints on time and the expected level of complexity for such problems.

physicsernaw
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We want to make a conical drinking cup out of paper. It should hold exactly 100 cubic inches of water. Find the dimensions of a cup of this type that minimizes the surface area.

Homework Equations


SA = pi*r^2 + pi*r*l where l is the slant height of the cone.

V = 1/3pi*r^2*h = 100

The Attempt at a Solution



I solve l in terms of h and r.

l = sqrt(r^2 + h^2)

Then I solve h in terms of r in the volume, and I get:

h = 300/pi*r^2

plugging this equation for h back in the equation for l, I get:

l = sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

SA(r) = pi*r^2 + pi*r*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2))

Then taking the derivative and setting it equal to zero:

SA'(r) = 2pi*r + pi*sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)) + 1/2*pi*r/(sqrt(r^2 + 300/(pi*r^2)))*(2r + 600/(pi*r^3)) = 0

Instead of trying to solve that ugly thing myself I plugged it into wolfram and it said no real solutions exist so I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any help pleasE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you drink from the cup when you have the lid on?
 
Man, I hate math... lol. Thanks.
 
Is there also an easier way to do this than the way I'm doing it? I get such long, ugly derivatives and finding the zeros is really tedious and time consuming... This is an exam review problem so I don't think the problem should take this long. Is there another approach I could use?

edit: I do get the right answer though, despite it taking a long time.
 
1. What you consider "long time" might not be felt like "long time" by others
2. Since you haven't really, posted the manner in which you've done your algebraic manipulations, no one can give you a "short cut", because we cannot see the algebraic pathways you actually chose to walk along..
 
Well, let's see if I can simplify the algebra a bit, on the spur of the moment:
\frac{dl}{dr}=\frac{r+h\frac{dh}{dr}}{l}
Thus, the optimizing equation becomes, effectively:
l+r\frac{dl}{dr}=0
That is:
l^{2}+r^{2}+rh\frac{dh}{dr}=0 (*)
Furthermore, we have:
\frac{dh}{dr}=-\frac{2}{r}h
therefore, (*) transmutes to:
2r^{2}-h^{2}=0

This ought to be correct simplfication.
 
Since h=\frac{3V}{\pi{r^{2}}}, we have:
r^{3}=\frac{3V}{\sqrt{2}\pi}
that is,
r=(\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}\pi})^{\frac{1}{3}}V^{\frac{1}{3}}
as our relation for minimized surface, given fixed volume of the open cone.
 
Last edited:
I would have never thought of doing it in that way..

Thanks for the insight and taking the time to help me..
 
  • #10
physicsernaw said:
I would have never thought of doing it in that way..

Thanks for the insight and taking the time to help me..
Very often, retaining symbols for butt-ugly expressions will simplify the computation relative to substituting the symbol with original butt-ugliness. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K