Optimizing Angle for Shooting at a Distance with a Sniper Rifle

  • Thread starter Thread starter taffman123
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the optimal angle for shooting a sniper rifle at a target 40 meters high and 1500 meters away. Participants emphasize the use of kinematic equations, particularly the horizontal and vertical components of projectile motion, to derive the necessary angle. Confusion arises around isolating variables and applying trigonometric identities, with suggestions to simplify the equations by substituting known values. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly manipulating equations to solve for time and angle, while also acknowledging the complexity of the problem. Ultimately, the participants are collaboratively working through the mathematical challenges to arrive at a solution.
taffman123
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
hello - i am a first year university student and received an assignment last week - one question i am having very difficulty with is a question about shooting a rifle gun. the question is

If you wanted to shoot an objec on a building that is 40 m high and and 1500 m far with a velocity of V what would be the angle? is there anyone who can get me on teh rigth track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, sorry posted in the other thread. How do you think you should start?
 
What kinematic equations do you know? Think about the horizontal component because now we have 1500m this is the easiest componet to calculate.
 
what do u mean?
 
You must know some kinematic equations, v =u +at, for example.
 
i know 5 kinematic equations

but only 4 i can use because i do not know what v2 is
 
d = v1t + 1/2at^2 = that is the one i am primarily trying to use
and also i am thinking of using d=vt
 
So, what do you know and what do you need to know? Which equation(s) statisfy the criteria?
 
with having a d = 1500m
v = 854cosx
and an unknown time it seems easy - but for me i got confused with the cosx

would my time = 1.756cosx? or would it = 1.756/cosx?
 
  • #10
d = vt is the same as d = ut + \frac{1}{2} at^2 without any acceleration. Which is the case horizontally, therefore you can calculate the horizontal flight time as a function of \theta
 
  • #11
(y axis)

d = 40m
t=?
a=-9.8m/s
v1= 854sinx

makin my equation

40=854sinxt + -4.9t^2
 
  • #12
Your time would be t = \frac{1500}{\cos x}
 
  • #13
Hootenanny said:
Your time would be t = \frac{1500}{\cos x}


what happened to the v of 854?
 
  • #14
Sorry I missed the co-efficent off. My mistake
 
  • #15
so when i isolate for t (vertical) would it look like

2t =Square root of (40/854sinx) X 1/-4.9 ? or did i make an isolation mistake
 
  • #16
I'm afraid you cannot isolate t, the equation is a quadratic.
 
  • #17
thats what i tohught because i had a t + t^2 but i just thought if i brought the ^2 over it would be ok
 
  • #18
No because only one term is squared, when you root both sides you will get t + \sqrt{t} = ....
 
  • #19
ok - so now my equation would look like

40/854sinx * 1/-4.9 = t + t^2 and now I am confused

the only thing i could do is substitute t = 1500/854cosx?
 
  • #20
but having all these cosx and sinx in the equation is going to fustrate me so much
 
  • #21
Yes, but I would suggest leaving it in the form 854 \sin x t - 4.6t^2 - 40 = 0
 
Last edited:
  • #22
ok so i used the quadratic to solve f or t but in my square root i have sinx now i am totally confused
 
  • #23
Try substituting in the t = \frac{1500}{854\cos x}into the equation 854 \sin x t - 4.6t^2 - 40 = 0 and using trig identities instead.
 
  • #24
i have a question - and hopefully u will not be offended - i am not here for anyone to do it for me - but i was just wondering - have u figured out the answer?
 
  • #25
No, I'm not offended but I haven't worked it through yet. I'm just telling you what I would do at each stage. I will work it through if you like though.
 
  • #26
right now i am at the stage

1.756cosx - 15.1169cos^2x-40= 0

and now i am stuck again
 
  • #27
but i did not use a trig idenity yet - so i migth have made a mistake?
 
  • #28
where's the \sin x gone?
 
  • #29
i had

854sinx( 1500/854cosx)

so after multplying i had a sinx on top and bottom so they canceled out but teh sinx was attached to cosx - am i still allowed to cancel it out
 
  • #30
You've multiplied the fraction wrong
 
  • #31
what was my mistake
 
  • #32
Multiplying fractions:
a \times \frac{b}{c} = \frac{a}{1} \times \frac{b}{c} = \frac{a \cdot b}{c}
So your first term should be:
\frac{1500 \times 854 \cdot \sin x}{854 \cos x} = \frac{1500 \cdot \sin x}{\cos x}
 
Last edited:
  • #33
question: where does the t come from - did we not sub in for t?
 
  • #34
Again, an oversight on my part,must be getting tired.
 
  • #35
ok so we have

1500sinx/cosx - 4.9(1500/854cosx)^2 - 40

1500tanx ( correct?) -4.9 (3.085cosx^2) -40 = 0

1500 tanx - 15.1169cos^2x-40 =0

is that correct?
 
  • #36
but i still don't see how that helps me find x?
 
  • #37
Your are correct. You need to get the two trig functions in the same form (sin, cosine, sec, etc.), but at the moment I can't recall any useful trig identities.
 
  • #38
i only have learned 2

sinx/cosx = tanx

and sin2x + cos2x = 1
 
  • #39
It may be worth venturing into the Math forums and asking about the idents.
 
  • #40
have u been able to figure out the answer

or would u be able to explain what hadeijv did ? becuase he is finished
 
  • #41
hadeijv squared the whole equation, giving as topsquark says a bi-quadratic. This allowed himto use the ident \sin^2 x + \cos^2 x = 1 to remove the sin and just leave cosine function.
 
  • #42
can i do that in my case as well?
 
  • #43
Yes, you are both working on the same problem and using the same equations. Looking at the other thread may give you some hints. Topsquark explained it well.
 
  • #44
okay, I am trying to work this out I am at 1500sinx / cosx -15/cos2x - 40 = 0 ... and i do not know where to go form here. and is this correct?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top