Optimizing Cylinder Dimensions for Material Buckling: Calculus Approach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sippyCUP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on optimizing the height-to-diameter ratio (H/D) of a cylinder to minimize material buckling, specifically focusing on the formula for material buckling (B_g)^2 = (2.405/r)^2 + (π/h)^2. The professor's assertion that the optimal ratio is H/D = 0.924 is challenged by user experiments showing that material buckling continues to decrease beyond this ratio. The user employed a spreadsheet to analyze variations in H/D, indicating that the formula may not hold under the conditions tested.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of material buckling principles
  • Familiarity with calculus and optimization techniques
  • Proficiency in using spreadsheet software for data analysis
  • Basic knowledge of Maple for mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate advanced optimization techniques in calculus
  • Learn how to effectively use Maple for solving optimization problems
  • Explore the implications of varying both height and diameter on material buckling
  • Study the relationship between geometric ratios and structural integrity in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focused on structural analysis and optimization, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of material properties.

sippyCUP
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't that hard but I cannot remember a nice Calculus way of doing it. I'm trying to find the ratio of height to diameter of a cylinder that produces the minimum material buckling (B_m)^2. The problem statement my professor provided states that the minimum is found at H/D=0.924, but my attempt at substitution has shown otherwise.

Homework Equations


The formula for material buckling of a cylinder is (B_g)^2 = (2.405/r)^2 + (pi/h)^2 which I have simplified to (B_g)^2 = 4[(2.405/d)^2 + (3.1416/2h)^2] .


The Attempt at a Solution


I ran a spreadsheet (attached) which varies the ratio H/D from 0.1 to 1.0. Material buckling decreased even beyond H/D=0.924. I fired up Maple but am not that competent with it so I got nowhere. If anyone has any ideas I would be much obliged.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sippyCUP said:
I'm trying to find the ratio of height to diameter of a cylinder that produces the minimum material buckling (B_m)^2.

The formula for material buckling of a cylinder is (B_g)^2 = (2.405/r)^2 + (pi/h)^2 which I have simplified to (B_g)^2 = 4[(2.405/d)^2 + (3.1416/2h)^2] .

Hi sippyCUP! :smile:

I don't get it … :confused:

You're trying to minimise a/D² + b/h² …

but what are you fixing? constant D? constant h? constant volume?
 
Hey tiny-tim,

Both h and d are free to vary... but only the ratio of them matters for the final answer. I'm trying to prove that h/d=0.924 produces the smallest (B_g)^2.

I ran a spreadsheet with d=10 constant and h varying from 1 to 10. This varied h/d from 0.1 to 1. However, the quantity (B_g)^2 decreased the entire time. If h/d=0.924 for minimum (B_g)^2, I should expect it to produce a minimum (B_g)^2 at h=9.24 and d=10.

Obviously the formula does not hold d and h in ratio form. Therefore, I could try changing h to a different value and playing the same game.

EDIT: Having looked at the formula again, I realize this won't help since d and h are the denominators of fractions that will decrease as (d,h) ----> infinity. So I don't really see how the minimum can even occur.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K