Optimizing Estimator Variance with Cramer-Rao Inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter EnzoF61
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
EnzoF61
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
If \overline{_}X1 and \overline{_}X2 are the means of independent random samples of size n1 and n2 from a normal population with the mean \mu and \sigma^2, show that the variance of the unbiased estimator Var(\omega\overline{_}X1 +(1-\omega)\overline{_}X2) is a minimum when \omega= n1 / (n1 + n2).

My professor gave a hint to find the Var(\omega\overline{_}X1 +(1-\omega)\overline{_}X2) and then to minimize with respect to \omega using first and second derivatives.

I understand to square out the coefficients due to independence but I'm not sure where to begin to find the variances of the means of independent random samples. I feel I should have an understanding to minimize with the Cramer-Rao Inequality. Maybe I'm trying to look too deep into what is being asked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show that \mbox{Var}(\overline{X_1}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n_1}? Hint: write \overline{X_1} as a sum of independent and identically distributed RVs and use \mbox{Var}(\sum Y_i) = \sum \mbox{Var}(Y_1) as well as pulling out a constant becomes multiplying by the square of the constant.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top