Optimizing Forces in Towing: Minimizing FB for a Given Resultant Force

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the forces in towing a truck with two ropes, aiming to minimize the force FB while achieving a resultant force of 950 N along the positive x-axis. Participants explore the relationships between the forces FA and FB, including their components and angles, and discuss the conditions under which FB is minimized. The conversation highlights the importance of calculus in finding the angle q that minimizes FB, emphasizing that the forces must be perpendicular to each other for optimal results. The participants also clarify that the approach to solving the problem varies depending on whether FA or FR is known. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the angles must sum to 90 degrees for the forces to achieve the desired minimum configuration.
  • #31
ehild said:
The result are not same, only close together. What did you get with my method?
70.11 clockwise
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It should be 71.12 clockwise.
 
  • #33
950 sin(q) + 2626.47 cos(q) = 0
950 tan (q) = -2626.47
tan q = - 2626.47 / 950
q =
daOrWIp.png

ehild said:
It should be 71.12 clockwise.
 
  • #34
There was some mistakes when we derived FB, and I did not notice.
Next time do the derivation symbolically, and plug in numerical data at the end. In that case, you would have got 70°.

It is true that the two angles add up to 90°.
If the angle of FA is a and the angle of FB is q, and the magnitude of the sum of the forces is F
FAcos(a) + FBcos(q) =F, (we measure q clockwise),
FA sin(a) = FB sin(q) --> FA=FB sin(q)/sin(a).
F_B=\frac{F}{\frac{\sin(q)}{\tan(a)}+\cos(q)}

If you want FB minumum, the denominator should be maximum. Take the derivative of ##\frac{\sin(q)}{\tan(a)}+\cos(q)## and make it equal to zero : ##\frac{\cos(q)}{\tan(a)}-\sin(q)=0##, that is ##\frac{1}{\tan(a)}-\tan(q)=0##
What does it mean for the angles a and q?
 
Last edited:
  • #35
ehild said:
There was some mistakes when we derived FB, and I did not notice.
Next time do the derivation symbolically, and plug in numerical data at the end. In that case, you would have got 70°.

It is true that the two angles add up to 90°.
If the angle of FA is a and the angle of FB is q, and the magnitude of the sum of the forces is F
FAcos(a) + FBcos(q) =F, (we measure q clockwise),
FA sin(a) = FB sin(q) --> FA=FB sin(q)/sin(a).
F_B=\frac{F}{\frac{\sin(q)}{\tan(a)}+\cos(q)}

If you want FB minumum, the denominator should be maximum. Take the derivative of ##\frac{\sin(q)}{\tan(a)}+\cos(q)## and make it equal to zero : ##\frac{\cos(q)}{\tan(a)}-\sin(q)=0##, that is ##\frac{1}{\tan(a)}-\tan(q)=0##
What does it mean for the angles a and q?

For FB perpendicular FA,is there an explanation for this ? why it works ? and why not perpendicular to FR ?

Sorry if i ask a lot of questions :)
 
  • #36
newbphysic said:
For FB perpendicular FA,is there an explanation for this ? why it works ?
It's easy to see geometrically.
Draw the 950N as a line OP with a length representing its magnitude, and a line for the direction of FA from the same origin.
The magnitude of FA will be indicated by a point on its line, Q say.
FB will be represented by a vector from Q to P. What position of Q minimises the length PQ?
 
  • #37
newbphysic said:
For FB perpendicular FA,is there an explanation for this ? why it works ? and why not perpendicular to FR ?

Sorry if i ask a lot of questions :)
It IS the explanation. ##\vec F_R ## is the sum of the vectors ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_B ##. We expressed their components with the magnitudes FA, FB and angles, a, q. Solved the system of equations for FB. It must be minimum, so its derivative with respect to q has to be zero. From that, we got the equation ##\frac{1}{\tan(a)}-\tan(q)=0##, that is, the tangent of the angle q is equal the reciprocal of the tangent of the other angle. Now, remember how the tangent was defined in a right triangle,
upload_2016-3-12_6-15-50.png

##tan(\alpha)=a/b## and ##tan(\beta)=b/a##, the tangents of the two angles are reciprocal to each others in a right triangle. But the sum of the two angles is 90°as the sum of all angles in a triangle makes 180°, one angle is 90° , so ##\alpha + \beta = 90°##. Any time when the tangents of two acute angles are reciprocal, their sum is 90°.
Here, the two forces ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_A ## enclose the angle a+q, and the tangents of the angles are reciprocal to each other, so a+q=90°, the forces are perpendicular to each other.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-3-12_6-16-36.png
    upload_2016-3-12_6-16-36.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 406
  • #38
haruspex said:
It's easy to see geometrically.
Draw the 950N as a line OP with a length representing its magnitude, and a line for the direction of FA from the same origin.
The magnitude of FA will be indicated by a point on its line, Q say.
FB will be represented by a vector from Q to P. What position of Q minimises the length PQ?
when it's perpendicular to FR ? the red line is the right answer according to calculation
:oldconfused:
YNdj7BL.png

ehild said:
##tan(\alpha)=a/b## and ##tan(\beta)=b/a##, the tangents of the two angles are reciprocal to each others in a right triangle. But the sum of the two angles is 90°as the sum of all angles in a triangle makes 180°, one angle is 90° , so ##\alpha + \beta = 90°##. Any time when the tangents of two acute angles are reciprocal, their sum is 90°.
Here, the two forces ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_A ## enclose the angle a+q, and the tangents of the angles are reciprocal to each other, so a+q=90°, the forces are perpendicular to each other.

OK :wink: but what i still don't understand is this, how can you know it must be perpendicular to FA not to FR. Here is another example that looks exactly like before but in this example Fb perpendicular Fr. Why it's different ?
6d2OKP7.png
C8Yu2Mf.png


I tried to use the your method and i find theta = 60 degrees
 
  • #39
newbphysic said:
OK :wink: but what i still don't understand is this, how can you know it must be perpendicular to FA not to FR. Here is another example that looks exactly like before but in this example Fb perpendicular Fr. Why it's different ?
6d2OKP7.png
C8Yu2Mf.png


I tried to use the your method and i find theta = 60 degrees
This is an other problem. Here Fa is given, FR has to be determined, so as its direction is the positive x axis. In the previous problem, FR was given and Fa was unknown.
From the equation Fa sin(30)=Fbsin(θ) ---> 2*1/2 = Fbsin(θ), you get that Fb=1/sin(θ), which is minimum if sin(θ)=1, that is, θ=90°.
 
  • #40
ehild said:
This is an other problem. Here Fa is given, FR has to be determined, so as its direction is the positive x axis. In the previous problem, FR was given and Fa was unknown.
From the equation Fa sin(30)=Fbsin(θ) ---> 2*1/2 = Fbsin(θ), you get that Fb=1/sin(θ), which is minimum if sin(θ)=1, that is, θ=90°.
I'm really confused :bugeye:

Why for the first problem i can't solve it like this one (without substituting FA)
FA sin(20) -FB sin(q) = 0
FB =FAsin(20)/sin(q)

I know that we don't know FA but we know in order for FB to be minimum sin(q) must equal 1 (the biggest value) but the result will not be 70
 
Last edited:
  • #41
newbphysic said:
when it's perpendicular to FR ? the red line is the right answer according to calculation
:oldconfused:
YNdj7BL.png
Neither line minimises the distance PQ, keeping P fixed and varying Q. (Or is P supposed to be where the red line meets the baseline?)
 
  • #42
haruspex said:
Neither line minimises the distance PQ, keeping P fixed and varying Q. (Or is P supposed to be where the red line meets the baseline?)
yimS4uH.png
P is fixed but Q vary.

Ooh i see so is this mean in order to find minimum value the unknown must perpendicular to each other ?
 
  • #43
newbphysic said:
yimS4uH.png
P is fixed but Q vary.

Ooh i see so is this mean in order to find minimum value the unknown must perpendicular to each other ?
If one has a fixed direction and you are trying to minimise the other, yes.
(I assume Q in the diagram is where the blue line meets the sloping black line.)
 
  • Like
Likes newbphysic
  • #44
newbphysic said:
I'm really confused :bugeye:

Why for the first problem i can't solve it like this one (without substituting FA)
FA sin(20) -FB sin(q) = 0
FB =FAsin(20)/sin(q)

I know that we don't know FA but we know in order for FB to be minimum sin(q) must equal 1 (the biggest value) but the result will not be 70
In the first problem, FR was given, you knew the point P and you had to draw a line to the line of FA, which length was the shortest. It is the normal from P to the line FA. That line segment corresponded to FB, and the red line segment corresponded to FA.
In the second problem, FA was given, you knew the point Q. You have to draw the shortest line from it to the line of FR. It is perpendicular to FR.
You know, that the shortest distance from a point to a straight line is the perpendicular to the given line.
upload_2016-3-12_13-10-28.png


If you drew a line perpendicular from P, its length would be longer than the real FB.
upload_2016-3-12_13-22-44.png
 
  • #45
haruspex said:
If one has a fixed direction and you are trying to minimise the other, yes.
(I assume Q in the diagram is where the blue line meets the sloping black line.)

ehild said:
In the first problem, FR was given, you knew the point P and you had to draw a line to the line of FA, which length was the shortest. It is the normal from P to the line FA. That line segment corresponded to FB, and the red line segment corresponded to FA.
In the second problem, FA was given, you knew the point Q. You have to draw the shortest line from it to the line of FR. It is perpendicular to FR.
You know, that the shortest distance from a point to a straight line is the perpendicular to the given line.
View attachment 97245

If you drew a line perpendicular from P, its length would be longer than the real FB.
View attachment 97246
Thank you for your help
:bow:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
24K