Optimizing Generator Efficiency with Metal Spheres: A Calculation Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter mailhiot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator Torque
AI Thread Summary
A 0.25 kg metal sphere dropped from 2 meters generates approximately 4.905 joules of energy, translating to a torque of about 2.45 NM, which is sufficient to start the generator requiring a starting torque of 2 NM. However, to achieve the generator's rated output of 3500 W, a continuous input of 150 NM is necessary, meaning that around 715 spheres would need to be dropped every second. This high frequency of drops could potentially damage the turbine and generator over time. The discussion highlights the complexity of achieving the required torque and energy output, suggesting that different generators may have varying specifications that affect performance. Overall, the feasibility of using metal spheres for this purpose raises concerns about practicality and efficiency.
mailhiot
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I need to do some calculations to know if a metal sphere (iron, steel, whatever) that is 0.25kg is dropped from 2 meters, will it produce enough torque (kenetic energy?) to start a generator with the specifications below? Furthermore, if a metal sphere was dropped every second, continuously, would the generator generate the 3500 W? If not, what size would the metal sphere have to be to make the generator work?

Rated rotation speed: 250 RPM
Rated output: 3500 W
Weight: 75 kg
Rotor inertia: 0.066 Kg.m2
Starting torque: <2.0 NM
Phase resistance: 2.7 ohms
Recified DC Current at Rated output: 11A
Required torque at rated output: 150 NM

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
force = .25 kg x 9.81 m/s^2 = 2.4525 Newtons
energy from dropped sphere = 2.4525 Newtons x 2 meters = 4.905 joules

If a sphere is dropped every second, you'd have 4.905 watts of input power, less than 1/700 of the output power you're trying to achived.
 
Thanks! Your answer shows that the energy from the dropped sphere is 2.45 NM. The generator requires a starting torque of 2 NM, so it looks to me that it would be enough to start the generator. The generator needs to get to 150 NM to get to the rated output of 3500 Watts. Wouldn't dropping a metal sphere every second eventually get the generator to the 150 NM? In other words, if each metal sphere delivers 2.45 NM, then it would take about 61 metal speres to get to 150 NM? Thanks!
 
mailhiot said:
Thanks! Your answer shows that the energy from the dropped sphere is 2.45 NM. The generator requires a starting torque of 2 NM.
Those are the same units, but the dropped object's NM is a quantiy of energy, not a torque. Also the energy is 4.9 NM, not 2.45 NM. Torque equals force times radius, and the force from the collision of the sphere would depend on how stiff the surfaces at the point of collision are. The torque generated would be related to the collision force times the distance from the axis of the generator to the point of impact. Depending on the inertia and loading of the generator, the impulse (average force x duration (time) of impact) of a single sphere may be too small to achieve initial startup.

Wouldn't dropping a metal sphere every second eventually get the generator to the 150 NM? In other words, if each metal sphere delivers 2.45 NM, then it would take about 61 metal speres to get to 150 NM? Thanks!
Each sphere has 4.9 NM of energy, but the goal is to generate 3500NM of energy every second. You'd have to drop at least 715 spheres every second to input 3500NM of energy to the generator.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply. The metal spheres drop and pass through a turbine, which is connected to a generator, similar to hydro, or even wind. The specs say it only needs 250 rpm and the output that this particular generator is 3500 W, so I am trying to get it to teh 250 rpm using metal spheres. From experiments I have done, dropping 715 spheres every second would probably destroy the turbine/generator, especially after a few minutes or hours! It seems like an awful lot. Are you sure there isn't some other variable in the equaltion, because every generator is different, that is, if you look at 3500 W generators, the start up torque required, rpm, etc can range a lot. I chose this one because the rpm is low at 250. Thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
22K
Back
Top