MHB Optimizing n for Integer Solutions in Factorial Expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find the smallest value of $n$ for which $\dfrac{n!\cdot n!}{(n+6)!}$ is an integer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find the smallest value of $n$ for which $\dfrac{n!\cdot n!}{(n+6)!}$ is an integer.

89

we need (n+1) to (n+6) all should be composite so product should be a factor of n!. then check that it is factor smallest 6 composite consecutive numbers start at 90

90 = 9 * 10
91 = 13 * 7
92 = 23 * 4
93 = 3 * 31
94 = 2 * 47
95 = 5 * 19

take the product and we have 10 different numbers < 90 on the right and product divided 89!
 
kaliprasad said:
89

we need (n+1) to (n+6) all should be composite so product should be a factor of n!. then check that it is factor smallest 6 composite consecutive numbers start at 90

90 = 9 * 10
91 = 13 * 7
92 = 23 * 4
93 = 3 * 31
94 = 2 * 47
95 = 5 * 19

take the product and we have 10 different numbers < 90 on the right and product divided 89!

Well done, kaliprasad!:cool:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top