Optimizing Tunnel Throughput: What Speed Maximizes Vehicle Volume Per Hour?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perplexed553
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing vehicle throughput in a tunnel based on vehicle speed. The problem is framed within the context of vehicle spacing and flow rates, specifically examining how speed affects the number of vehicles that can pass through the tunnel per hour.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive a formula for vehicle flow rate (Q) based on the given spacing equation. There are questions about the validity of setting vehicle spacing to zero and how to derive the flow rate equation from the spacing equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints regarding the relationship between vehicle flow, speed, and spacing. There is an acknowledgment of the need to derive the flow rate equation from the spacing formula, but no consensus or resolution has been reached regarding the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem is based on historical data and that the discussion has been ongoing for several years, with some expressing that the original poster has not returned to the thread.

Perplexed553
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


historical data shows that between 15 and 35 mph, the space x between vehicles (in miles) is x = 0.324/(42.1 - v)
where v is the vehicles speed in miles per hour

Ignoring the length of individual vehicles, what speed will give the tunnel the largest volume in vehicles per hour?

Homework Equations


x = .324/(42.1-v)

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I could set x = 0 (because spacing would be 0 ignoring the length of vehicles) and solve for v. That isn't correct.
They show a solution where Q= cars/hour = (42.1v-v^2) / .324. I don't see where they get this.
Then it looks like they take the derivative with respect to v of the numerator only and set it to next to 0
dQ/dv = 0 = 42.1 -2v/.324 = 21.05 mph. This part makes sense to me but I still don't understand where they get Q = (42.1v - v^2)/.324.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perplexed553 said:

Homework Statement


historical data shows that between 15 and 35 mph, the space x between vehicles (in miles) is x = 0.324/(42.1 - v)
where v is the vehicles speed in miles per hour

Ignoring the length of individual vehicles, what speed will give the tunnel the largest volume in vehicles per hour?

Homework Equations


x = .324/(42.1-v)

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I could set x = 0 (because spacing would be 0 ignoring the length of vehicles) and solve for v. That isn't correct.

If you analyze the formula for the spacing of the vehicles, you will see there is no speed v which can make x = 0.

They show a solution where Q= cars/hour = (42.1v-v^2) / .324. I don't see where they get this.
Then it looks like they take the derivative with respect to v of the numerator only and set it to next to 0
dQ/dv = 0 = 42.1 -2v/.324 = 21.05 mph. This part makes sense to me but I still don't understand where they get Q = (42.1v - v^2)/.324.

From the data given about vehicle speeds and vehicle spacing, you've got to figure out how to determine the number of vehicles Q which enter the tunnel, as a function of vehicle speed, v. Once you have Q as a function of vehicle speed, then you can figure out which speed v gives the maximum Q.
 
In case SteamKing's hint is not clear, there is a simple relationship between Q, v and x.
 
Perplexed553 said:
They show a solution where Q= cars/hour = (42.1v-v^2) / .324. I don't see where they get this.
Read vehicle flow analysis
that's where the formula comes from
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SabemosqueSePuede said:
Read vehicle flow analysis
that's where the formula comes from
In the homework exercise in post #1, the student was expected to derive that formula from the given one, x = 0.324/(42.1 - v).
Anyway, the thread is over six years old.
 
haruspex said:
Anyway, the thread is over six years old.
And deserves to be closed. The OP posted the question and never returned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K