Optimum (min/max) of a symmetric function

  • Thread starter Thread starter NaturePaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Symmetric
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conditions under which a symmetric function achieves its optimum value. It is proposed that if a symmetric function f(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) has an optimum, it should occur at the point where all variables are equal (x_1 = x_2 = ... = x_n). However, counterexamples exist, such as functions with multiple maxima that do not align with this condition. The conversation also touches on the implications of convexity, noting that for convex functions, local optima are global optima, but the convexity of the specific function in question remains uncertain. Ultimately, the relationship between symmetry and the nature of the function's optima is complex and requires further exploration.
NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm wondering if the following argument is right:

"The optimum (minimum/maximum) value of a symmetric function f(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) (By 'symmetric' I mean that f remains same if we alter any x_i's with x_j's), if exists, should be at the point x_1=x_2=...=x_n".

Please help me by proving (or disproving, i.e, a counter example) this argument. I have examine some well-known symmetric functions and these obey the rules. However, a general proof (or reference to literature, document etc.) is needed.


[I think this may be right, in the sense that the graph of the function (in n+1 dimensional space) should be symmetric about all axes, so if f has optimum at x_1=a, by the symmetry of the curve, x_2=...=x_n=a.]


Regards,
NaturePaper
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume that you mean that the optimum, if it exists, should be unique. Say it is some point (a_1,\ldots,a_n), but then a_1=\ldots=a_n, because otherwise one could interchange two coordinates to obtain another optimum.
 
@yyat,
Oh..., Let us consider the global optimum (min/max) for f. For convex f, it is known that every local optimum is the global optimum. However, I don't know whether f is convex or not. But I think the following discussion is right:

Let f has a global optimum (by definition, it is unique). Then the set of points where f attains it should contain the point x_1=x_2=...=x_n= some constant, by your argument.

Am I right?

Regards
NaturePaper
 
By uniqueness I meant that the optimum is only achieved at a single point, otherwise the argument becomes false. For example, consider the function on R^2 that is mostly 0 but has two http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bump_function" at (1,0) and (0,1) that are mirror images of themselves with respect to the diagonal (x_1=x_2). Then the function has two global maxima, but none of them on the diagonal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyway, if I restrict f to be symmetric, even function [i.e. f(-X)=f(X)], any number of time differentiable, then is it possible to make any comment about its global optimum?
At least, is f convex etc...?

Actually, my function f is like f=[g(x_1,x-2,...,x_n)]^2, where g is symmetric, bounded and any time differentiable. Is it possible to comment about the convexity of f etc?

Regards,
NaturePaper
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top