LURCH said:
D H said:
That is contrary to the meaning of the term "altitude", which invariably means height above some reference surface.
Yes, I know. But what I'm asking is that we all refer to the distance above center of mass, because it removes an unnecessary complication, and avoids the need for secondary calculations such as...
diazona said:
If I remember correctly, the moon's mass is 1/6 that of Earth, and it's radius is about 1/3 of the Earth's, so I guess the orbital velocity at a given (small) altitude is reduced by about a factor of 2...
Distance above the surface does not effect orbital dynamics, and I believe this would help the OP gain the understanding he seeks.
Whatever makes you think that? Distance above the surface most definitely does affect orbital dynamics. Moreover, distance
below the surface most definitely hinders orbital mechanics. A satellite could not orbit the Earth at the orbital radius corresponding to an orbital altitude of 100 km above the surface of the Moon because that orbital radius is well inside the Earth. A satellite can however orbit 200 km above the surface of the Earth or the Moon.
The problem with diazona's analysis was incorrect values for the Moon's mass and radius. So, let's do it correctly.
The orbital velocity for a circular orbit at altitude
h is
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R+h}}[/tex]
The ratio of the orbital velocities for orbits at the same altitude about the Earth and Moon is thus
[tex]
\frac{v_e}{v_m} = \sqrt{\frac{M_e}{M_m}\,\frac{R_m+h}{R_e+h}}<br />
\approx \sqrt{\frac{Me}{Mm}\,\frac{R_m}{R_e}}\,\left(1+\frac h 2\,\frac{R_e-R_m}{R_eR_m}\right)[/tex]
Using the correct numbers, M
m/M
e=0.0123 and R
m/R
e=0.273, yields v
e/v
m=4.71 for h=0, increasing as altitude increases. The ratio is 5.15 for h=500 km, at which point the approximation is still valid to within about 1%.