Order of group elements ab and ba

  • Thread starter Thread starter antiemptyv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Group
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the orders of the group elements ab and ba are equal. This is situated within the context of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the equality (ab)^{x} = (ba)^{x} = 1, discussing the relationship between the orders of the elements ab and ba. Some participants question the sufficiency of the proof provided, particularly regarding the distinction between proving equality and divisibility of orders.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the proof's validity, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the steps involved and the implications of the results. Guidance has been offered regarding the need for further clarification on certain steps and the distinction between orders being equal and one order dividing another.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of group elements, particularly in relation to their orders, and are considering the implications of different notations for the identity element in groups.

antiemptyv
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that in any group the orders of ab and ba equal.

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



Let (ab)^{x} = 1.

Using associativity, we get

(ab)^{x} = a(ba)^{x-1}b = 1.

Because of the existence of inverses--namely a^{-1} and b^{-1}--this implies

(ba)^{x-1} = a^{-1}b^{-1} = (ba)^{-1}.

Multiplying both sides by (ba) = ((ba)^{-1})^{-1} yields

(ba)^{x} = 1.

So,

(ab)^{x} = (ba)^{x} = 1,

and the orders ab and ba are the same.

---

How is that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks correct.
 
Thanks!
 
Well, technically you only proved that
(ba)^{\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}(ab)} = 1
which leads to the conclusion that the order of ba is a divisor of the order of ab. You have to do a little bit more work to prove they are equal.
 
Ahhh, I see... I think. So, if (ab)^{x} = (ba)^{x} = 1, then ord(ba) divides ord(ab), AND ord(ab) divides ord(ba). Thus, ord(ab) = ord(ba)?
 
Right. It's important to pay attention to the difference between proving the order is equal to something, and the order simply divides something. I know I've made mistakes before by messing that up.
 
Thanks for your help and advice.
 
Hi,
I don't understand the step that goes:
Using associativity, we get
(ab)^{x} = a(ba)^{x-1}b = 1.
Could someone elaborate, thanks!
 
sairalouise said:
Hi,
I don't understand the step that goes:
Using associativity, we get
(ab)^{x} = a(ba)^{x-1}b = 1.
Could someone elaborate, thanks!
So I know where you're coming from... what have you done to try and understand it? Have you worked through any special cases? Made attempts at proving it?
 
  • #10
I can show that the orders of an element and its inverse are equal, and have tried supposing that ab and ba have different orders to reach a contradiciton but i can't work the problem though.
 
  • #11
sairalouise said:
I can show that the orders of an element and its inverse are equal, and have tried supposing that ab and ba have different orders to reach a contradiciton but i can't work the problem though.
I meant the specific line you were asking about:
(ab)^{x} = a(ba)^{x-1}b​
 
  • #12
i just don't see how to get from one side of the equation to the other.
 
  • #13
Hey, now i can!
 
  • #14
is saying (ab)^{x} = 1. the same as saying (ab)^{x} = e?
 
  • #15
Firepanda said:
is saying (ab)^{x} = 1. the same as saying (ab)^{x} = e?

Can someone confirm this for me please? it would greatly help my understanding
 
  • #16
Yes and no. You can name the identity element of a group whatever you want, just like you can name the group operation whatever you want, as well as the inverse operation. The identity in antiemptyv's group was named '1'. That group doesn't have any elements named 'e', so <br /> (ab)^{x} = e<br /> can't even make sense.
 
  • #17
antiemptyv said:
Ahhh, I see... I think. So, if (ab)^{x} = (ba)^{x} = 1, then ord(ba) divides ord(ab), AND ord(ab) divides ord(ba). Thus, ord(ab) = ord(ba)?

I hope I don't get a warning for necro-posting but I was doing research on order of elements of a group and came across this.

Hurkyl's comment that we only proved that |ba|= x means |ba| | x and not equal x.

But the proof that it is equal appeas to be weak.

So we're saying (ba)x=(ab)x = e implies |ba| | |ab| and |ab| | |ba| which makes them equal. seems weak to me.

Let |ba| = d s.t. d < x and x = k.d for some pos. integer k, then surely d ≠ x.

any ideas?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K