Understanding Constant Velocity and Acceleration in Frictionless Environments

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Reisen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concepts of constant velocity and acceleration in frictionless environments, specifically addressing a scenario involving a 5kg box on a frictionless floor with a force readout of 18N. It establishes that if the box is moving at a constant velocity, there is no acceleration, leading to a force of zero acting on the box according to F=ma. However, if the box is initially stationary while the surrounding system is in motion, a force must be exerted to accelerate the box, demonstrating the difference between theoretical physics and real-world applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Basic knowledge of constant velocity and acceleration concepts
  • Familiarity with frictionless environments in physics
  • Ability to analyze force diagrams and motion scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's Laws in non-inertial reference frames
  • Learn about the effects of friction on motion in real-world scenarios
  • Explore advanced topics in classical mechanics, such as dynamics of systems with multiple bodies
  • Investigate the role of forces in accelerating objects in various environments
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion in idealized and real-world contexts.

Reisen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Your standard first-post-pleading-for-help here :)

This doesn't make sense:

Say you've got a setup like in picture 1 (floor is frictionless)

If the F readout on the scale is 18N, and the box is 5kg and F=ma, then 18N/5kg = 3.6m/s^2 = a, right? Okay...

Now, if the velocity is constant, there is no acceleration, yes? But then F = ma, then F = 5kg * (0m/s^2) = 0. But if the boxcar were moving forward at a constant rate with a frictionless floor, the box would slide to the back, wouldn't it? The rope has to be exerting SOME force on the box to keep it in place, so that's why I'm wondering how this doesn't work.

Thanks in advance to whoever points out my mistake :)

-Reisen
 

Attachments

  • boxcar.gif
    boxcar.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 594
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if everything in your picture, the box, car and scale is moving at the same constant velocity initally then nothing would change. Everything would in the same position relative to everything else.

However if the box is not moving initally but everything else is then yes, the box would move towards the back of the truck and the scale would have to apply a force on the box to accelerate it.
 
Ah, yes. Thank you. I was getting the real world all confused with the perfect world of elementary physics :D

That answers my question, thank you.

-Reisen
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K