Origin of Vector Cross Product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origin and physical interpretation of the vector cross product. Participants explore its mathematical foundations, historical context, and applications in physics, particularly in electrodynamics and torque. The conversation includes inquiries about the nature of the cross product compared to vector addition and its definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the physical meaning of the cross product, questioning whether it is merely a definition that results in a vector perpendicular to the original vectors.
  • Another participant notes that the cross product, along with other vector operations, are mathematical concepts and asks for clarification on what is meant by "physical terms."
  • A participant claims that the origin of the vector cross product is linked to the quaternion product and discusses the historical context of its development, mentioning the debate between quaternionists and vectorialists.
  • It is suggested that there are multiple ways to define the cross product, with some definitions being equivalent in three dimensions.
  • One participant points out that the cross product was utilized as a geometric construct before the development of quaternions, emphasizing the historical significance of geometry.
  • Another participant raises a question about the usefulness of the cross product in electrodynamics and whether its application is coincidental.
  • Several participants mention the application of the cross product in calculating torque, with differing expressions provided for the torque formula.
  • There is a discussion about the noncommutative nature of the cross product, with participants clarifying the order of vectors in the torque equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the origin and definitions of the cross product, with some agreeing on its historical ties to quaternions while others emphasize its earlier geometric applications. The usefulness of the cross product in physics is acknowledged, but the discussion remains unresolved regarding its interpretation and significance.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different definitions and applications of the cross product, indicating that there may be limitations in understanding its physical meaning without a clear consensus on its origin and mathematical properties.

SpartanG345
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
I understand the cross product of vectors to some degree and i can calculate. But i don't really understand the origin of the cross product

What does a vector cross product mean in physical terms. Vector addition is quite easy to understand. I don't think the cross product is 'multiplication of vectors' as multiplication can be broken down into a series of additions at least for scalars.

Is the cross product simply a definition such that the product of 2 different components of a 2 vectors result in a multiplication of the magnitude in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the original vector components?

I don't really understand this in physical terms. All the books i have read have explained it in the above way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The vector cross product, as well as the dot product and other vector manipulations, are all mathematical concepts. What do have in mind for "physical terms".
 
The origin of the vector cross product is the quaternion product. There was a minor skirmish in the field of mathematics at the end of the 19th century between the "quaternionists" (Hamilton et al) and the "vectorialists" (Gibbs, Heaviside, et al). Hamilton's quaternions were elegant, but maybe a bit too complex for everyday use -- and they did not quite fit into our three dimensional universe. Vectors are not quite as mathematically elegant, but they are simpler, and at least on the surface, they fit our 3D universe to a T.
 
Is the cross product simply a definition such that the product of 2 different components of a 2 vectors result in a multiplication of the magnitude in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the original vector components?

Sometimes, yes, that is precisely the way it's defined. In others, we just define it using the vector notation. There are many more ways to define it. In 3 dimensions, I'm pretty sure most of them are equal, at least for most vectors.

D H said:
The origin of the vector cross product is the quaternion product.
That's not entirely true. It was studied as a useful geometric construct much earlier. You have to remember that geometry is very old, and quaternions are a relatively recent concept.

In the end, what's important is not where it came from but the fact that it stuck around, mainly because it's so useful.
 
How is it the cross product so much useful in "electrodynamics" was discovered before it.
Is it a mere coincidence that laws of electrodynamics can so easily be expressed using the cross product
 
Nothing is coincidence...

Torque also uses cross product.

[tex]\vec{T}=\vec{F} \times \vec{r}[/tex]
 
Torque is:

[tex]\vec{T}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}[/tex]

Cross product is noncommutative.
 
Ah...

Thanks, I've always read it as T=Fr for perpendicular forces and radii, and never knew that it was different.
 
If I remember anything from my multivariable calc, it can be expressed as [tex]\vec{T}=-\vec{F} \times \vec{r}[/tex] if you would like. I've usually seen it in r cross F though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K